Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Council Minutes <br />August 1, 1983 <br />Page Two <br /> <br />Mr. Terry Maurer, of Consulting Engineers Diversified, indicated that a stop <br />sign at Holt and School Street was not warranted and was removed at the plans <br />and specifications stage of the School Street Improvement Project. Mr. Maurer <br />indicated that the state goes through a warrant process when determining a <br />traffic sign or signal for a specific area. Mr. Maurer indicated that the <br />warrant process considers accidents in the area, and traffic volume over an <br />eight hour period. Mr. Maurer further indicated that traffic studies show <br />that when stop signs are placed where they aren't warranted, they are disobeyed. <br /> <br />Mr. Butch Elliot, a resident of the area indicated that the neighbors in the area <br />petitioned the City Council to place a stop sign at the intersection of Holt and <br />School Street to protect the children and the residents in the area. Mr. Elliot <br />indicated that there were not any accidents at the intersection because of the <br />stop sign. Mr. Elliot indicated that he has traveled allover the country and <br />believes that stop signs are placed at specific intersections for specific reasons <br />and one of those reasons is to slow traffic. Mr. Elliot indicated that cars race <br />down School Street, but they stop at the stop sign before they speed up again <br />to Highway 169. <br /> <br />Counci1member Duitsman asked if there were specific standards for warranting <br />stop signs around school zones. Mr. Maurer indicated that the state recommends <br />speed signs and painted crosswalk areas in school zones, but does not deal with <br />stop signs. <br /> <br />Ms. Colleen DeMars indicated that kids just do not look when they cross the street, <br />and she believes the stop sign does slow traffic and save lives. <br /> <br />The City Administrator indicated that with the proposal of the PUD there would <br />be more people in the area unfamiliar with the stop sign and, therefore, creating <br />that sense of false security. The City Administrator further indicated that the <br />way to address the problem of speeding on School Street would be radar. <br /> <br />Counci1member Schuldt indicated that if the City Council was to consider the <br />importance of stop signs at specific areas, he felt there are many other inter- <br />sections in the City that were in greater need of stop signs, specifically Proctor <br />and Main Street, Main and Norfolk, 4th and Morton. Counci1member Schuldt indicated <br />that there are students everywhere within the City of Elk River, and that Main <br />Street receives a heavy use of vehicle traffic. Counci1member Schuldt also men- <br />tioned the heavy commercial use. at the Dairy Queen. <br /> <br />Counci1member Gunkel indicated that a previous City Council determined that the <br />sign belonged at the intersection of Holt and School Street, and that the stop <br />sign should not have been removed without the neighboring residents aware of the <br />plan. Discussion was carried on regarding the school patrol in the area, and <br />discussion was also carried on regarding the speed of the school kids along <br />School Street. Ms. Colleen DeMars indicated that the street is very busy between <br />7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. with buses and school traffic, that it is almost im- <br />possible to get onto School Street. Counci1member Duitsman indicated that he <br />wanted to study the situation before making a recommendation. <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED TO AUTHORIZE THE STOP SIGN AT HOLT AND SCHOOL STREET. <br />COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN SECONDED THE MOTION. <br /> <br />Mayor Hinkle indicated that he agreed with the City Administrator's comments, but <br />also felt the concern of the neighbors in the area. Mayor Hinkle further indicated <br />