My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-07-1983 CC MIN - SPECIAL
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Minutes
>
City Council 1974 - Present
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
07-07-1983 CC MIN - SPECIAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:34:46 AM
Creation date
4/13/2005 3:29:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
CCM
date
7/7/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />City Council Minutes <br />July 7, 1983 <br />Page Three <br /> <br />Mr. Santwire questioned the indication of the Council that if the developers would <br />sign waivers of objection to the assessment, the developers would get the density <br />changes requested. Councilmember.D itsmanindicated that the request for a change <br />in the plan is actually the right t come back to the Council with a higher density <br />plan if necessary. The City Admini trator indicated that the change requested from <br />67 units to the 120 units is consistant with the zoning. Councilmember Duitsman <br />indicated that there is no guarante that there would be 120 units, and that the <br />developers are asking for the right to consider 120 units. <br /> <br />Councilmember Gunkel questioned the <br />be developed for a number of years. <br />would lose $78,000 in MSA funds, an <br />Department of Transportation would <br />years for the road to be constructe <br />funds as proposed. Discussion was <br />new bids should the contract not be <br /> <br />Mayor Hinkle indicated that the sto <br />make sense to use the current sanit <br />indicated that he felt it was a was <br />pond in the PUD. Mayor Hinkle furt <br />around, as predicted, the City woul <br />again, and further indicated that a <br />if the project to the PUD was not c <br /> <br />need of a road through a field which might not <br />The City Administrator indicated that the City <br />further indicated that the State of Minnesota <br />ant a formal commitment of approximately two <br />through the PUD in order to obtain the MSA <br />arried on regarding the timing of obtaining <br />awarded at the present time. <br /> <br />m sewer is in School Street, that it does not <br />ry sewer easements through the PUD, and further <br />e of money to construct a temporary holding <br />er indicated that he felt if the economy turns <br />not receive as favorable bids as they have <br />proximately $78,000 in MSA funds would be lost <br />nstructed. <br /> <br />Mr. Gary Santwire indicated that th City does not have a Developer's Agreement with <br />the developers of the PUD, and furt er questioned the City's requirement regarding <br />water supply. <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN MOVED TO ADO T RESOLUTION 83-13 ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTION OF <br />WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS RELATED TO E GATES AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AND TO AWARD <br />THE CONTRACT TO BARBAROSSA AND SONS CONTINGENT UPON THE CITY OF ELK RIVER HOLDING A <br />PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THE PHASIN PLAN OF THE PUD, OBTAINING EASEMENTS FROM THE <br />LANDOWNER AND DEVELOPER, AND OBTAIN NG WAIVER'S OF OBJECTION TO THE ASSESSMENTS <br />FROM THE LANDOWNER AND DEVELOPERS F R THE PORTIONS OF THE CONTRACT INVOLVING THE <br />PUD. COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT SECONDE THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 3-1. COUNCIL- <br />MEMBER GUNKEL OPPOSED. <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER DUITSMAN MOVED T RESOLUTION 83-14 ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTION <br />OF THE GATES AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PRO ECT, AND TO AWARD THE CONTRACT TO BARBAROSSA <br />AND SONS IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,059,88 .40 CONTINGENT UPON THE CITY OF ELK RIVER HOLDING <br />A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THE PHAS NG PLAN OF THE PUD, OBTAINING EASEMENTS FROM THE <br />LANDOWNER AND DEVELOPER, AND OBTAIN NG WAIVER'S OF OBJECTION TO THE ASSESSMENTS FROM <br />THE LANDOWNER AND DEVELOPERS FOR TH PORTIONS OF THE CONTRACT INVOLVING THE PUD. <br />COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT SECONDED THE OTION. <br /> <br />Councilmember Gunkel indicated that <br />PUD, but was in favor of the other <br />the improvement of Gates Avenue, th <br />but because of the way the motion w <br /> <br />THE MOTION PASSED 3-1. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />not in favor of the improvements for the <br />egments of the improvement project involving <br />storm sewer and the water for the lower portion, <br />s worded, would have to vote against the motion. <br /> <br />R GUNKEL OPPOSED. <br /> <br />Councilmember Gunkel requested that individual notices be mailed to all parties <br />that were previously notified in th original public hearing of the PUD. <br /> <br />The City Administrator indicated <br /> <br />t he had met with the Lion's Club regarding <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.