Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />-., <br /> <br />PAGE 5 <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES <br />DECEMBER 16. 1985 <br /> <br />6. Continued Public Hearing of Amendment to Barthel POD Amendment <br /> <br />Ken Barthel presented <br />the parcels and noted <br />further pointed out the <br />Store. <br /> <br />the Council with the updated platting of <br />that these would now be lots and blocks. He <br />location of the Hardware Store and the Pamida <br /> <br />Councilmember Gunkel noted that the hardware store was proposed for a <br />different location at the October 21st meeting than what was being shown <br />tonight. Mayor Hinkle indicated he could not make a decision because <br />there was no site plan to base his decision on. Councilmember Gunkel <br />noted noted that if the Council gives approval of what is proposed <br />tonight. they would be approving other documents which they don't have <br />yet. <br /> <br />Mr. Nick Olson noted he had a couple of concerns with the situation. He <br />noted one concern would be residential - multi-family buffer which was to <br />have been started by now. He also noted he was concerned about the <br />entrance to Burger King on School Street and the traffic conjestion this <br />was going to cause. <br /> <br />The City Attorney. Dave Se11ergren noted that he would need the new <br />drawings to draw up the proceedings in the developer's agreement. <br /> <br />COUNCILMlMBER GUNKEL MOVED TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO DECEMBER 30. <br />1985. UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT. BARTHEL CAN GET THE UPDATED AND CURREJrl' <br />MATERIAL TO THE CITY. COUNCILMBMBER WILLIAMS SECONDED THE MOTON. THE <br />MOTION PASSED 4-0. <br /> <br />8. Consideration of Sign Ordinance Amendment <br /> <br />Mayor Hinkle noted he felt the Sign Ordinance should be looked at by the <br />City's Attorney before the Council adopts it. <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS <br />ORDINANCE AMENDMENT. <br />MOTION PASSED 4-0. <br /> <br />MOVED TO TABLE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THI SIGN <br />COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM SECONDED 'l'HI MOTION. THB <br /> <br />9A. Consideration of Resolution giving Preliminary Approval to a Proposed <br />Indu8tria1 Development Project by Jay Morrell and John Plaisted <br /> <br />The City Administrator noted the Elk River City Council had authorized an <br />application to the Minnesota Department of Energy and Economic <br />Development for an allocation from the Competitive Pool for the <br />Industrial Development Project proposed by Mr. Jay Morrell and Mr. John <br />Plaisted. He noted the project was for a 10.000 square foot hardware <br />facility in the Elk River Mall. and further noted the amount of the <br />allocation requested from the State was $400.000. He further indicated <br />only $304.260 had been received because the Plaisted project was the last <br />one to be funded and there was only $304.260 remaining in the pool. He <br />