Laserfiche WebLink
W---- <br /> , North Line 0/ NW l/4, SW V4, Sec 28, Twp 33, Roy 26- ^.� 93--d A a �� � u w , • �..�_ _�... - -- <br /> Jr/ i . , <br /> r 1 t <br /> lora / / ' I <br /> / C3 QA/ <br /> 10ry/ ' • <br /> "IV0 <br /> / <br /> .1,• O/• • •y Y N % f I 1.• e <br /> • <br /> / ."). <br /> F <br /> / e r,,.cIi, <br /> s'.CHAIN LINK FENCE w/ BARB WIRE ON TOP �o�° ` 9 ,.. F <br /> X X X X X X / cz• / Q ti kf: <br /> • / SCO' O � „:O0 ` , tif A Y( V <br /> i.,j r <br /> . h•$ • - �, <br /> gj <br /> I <br /> 66 <br /> t <br /> 89.00 i -I <br /> N89°51'l0"W 489.45 a <br /> ke Roads `.y r. r <br /> _ Q . • <br /> st Quarter of . > ,-- 1) The, two above drainage easements--were written by us about 8/26/91 for t <br />' of the Southeast-:, purpose that said easement* were to beconveyed to the-City' of'S1k•River. N< <br /> the highway _ ' that the ,;' id (westerly) of said easements now.has portions of they 1mprovemer <br /> A: ” this prop4wty encroaohin.g into same. • ... $'.f.. " . . <br /> he <br /> x- <br /> he Southwest ' '- -• _, Because we;were not given any evidence. of title forthis'survey (le:' updated a <br /> ng the North .line copies of conveyances, etc.) we are not aware il-either, or both, of said easen <br /> recoads Bast for ..,. , ,,,. • -were ever conveyed to the. City as intended. In the case of 'the 2nd (westerly, <br /> for 213.48 feet, ` - - easement, 'a'portion of same may have been vacated so that said improvemen <br /> t—of-way; thence " be built upon that land. If that.is the case; and if we are given a copy of s <br /> right—of—way for . - " , partial release (etc.), we can revise this survey to show same. • , <br /> ht—ot—way: thence . . . , <br /> tial curve concave =, 2) The V P.A. easement above may have subsequently been partially released <br /> .- ma .+,t..,.r�. yo' l,s 1Ptc t van the 'north 73 Leet" as shown hereon: Alain. if that is the case. e <br />