5.6 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Memo to Planning Commission/CU 99-24 June 17, 1999 Page 3 • Angel Ridge, the adjacent apartment building has 17 spaces separate from the main parking area of the complex. Their 17 spaces were approved as part of the PUD approval in 1992. The applicant has indicated that of the seniors using the facility, 55-60% are residents within one of the three buildings. Of the 142 residents, 48 still own a vehicle. There are 7 employees between the kitchen and office staff. In addition, senior may attend activities via the River Rider, a senior transportation service. The parking as proposed meets the code requirements. Access will continue to be via the existing driveways. No changes are proposed to the driveways. Drainage/Landscaping With the building and parking additions, green space will be lost. As part of the building permit application, a grading and drainage plan should be submitted. The applicant will need to comply with the comments of the City Engineer. The total impervious surface will be 41%. A landscape plan was not submitted, however, it appears that none of the existing trees will be affected by either the building or the parking additions. If trees are to be • removed as a result of either activity, a landscape plan should be submitted and the trees replaced. Landscaping should be installed around the building. Recommendation The proposed expansions meet the code requirements and pose no adverse impact to adjacent uses or structures. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the request CU 99-24 with the following conditions: 1. THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN AS PART OF THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION AND SHALL COMPLY WITH THE COMMENTS OF THE CITY ENGINEER. 2. IF TREES ARE TO BE REMOVED AS PART OF THE BUILDING OR PARKING EXPANSION, A LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL BE SUBMITTED AND THE TREES REMOVED.