3.1, 3.3 &3.4 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

5. The grading plan should show drainage away from the proposed clinic building on the west side. 6. At the south end of the remodeling area, there is an access from Freeport Avenue into the existing building. Currently, that access has an existing spillway through the curb line to the north which provides drainage from this access road. The remodeled parking lot eliminates this spillway but does not provide any means of picking up the drainage from the existing access road. We would suggest an extension of storm sewer from catch basin #13 to the access road with the installation of a new catch basin to provide for this existing drainage. 7. It appears that catch basin #19 has an error in its rim elevation. The rim is shown at 908.4, and the closest contour in that area is a 911. 8. There should be more details shown east of the proposed restaurant to indicate which way the drainage from this area will flow. The existing plan appears to show a high point in this area that is not shown on the proposed grading plan. 9. The Elk River Municipal Utilities have asked that the new hydrant shown on the north side of the clinic be shortened up. Currently, the hydrant lead is 150 feet from the building service. They have asked that the hydrant be placed nearer the building service and most of the 150-foot hydrant lead be eliminated. An easement needs to be provided over this hydrant lead including the hydrant. 10. The storm sewer existing and proposed on this site is considered a private utility. Some of the new private storm sewer near Retail Space A on the east side of the building falls within the public utility easement which currently has water and electric service in it. It should be made clear that in the future if the City needs access to the watermain or electric service in there and endangers the storm sewer, repair of the storm sewer will be at the Owner's expense. 11. The plan shows a new monument sign to be located in the existing drainage and utility easement at the northeast corner of the site. A new location outside of the easement should be found for this sign. 12. Clearly, the key issue on this proposed redevelopment is parking. Since you • have been coordinating information on this issue with the developers, I will leave comments on parking to you. The one comment we would make about parking is that it will be important to review the proposed demolition plan and construction plan as they impact the existing parking to ensure that adequate parking will be available at all times for the ongoing heater use on this site. If you have any questions regarding these comments, please call. Sincerely, Howard R. Green Company • Terry J. aurer, P.E. 0:\PROD\807240)\0240\230-190!-er ' ;rd R. Green Comoany CONSULTING ENGINEERS