6.6 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• The Honorable Chairman and Planning Commission March 15, 1999 Page Two 5. The bituminous along the north site of the proposed new building does not meet the City set back requirement of 10 feet from the property line. 6. It will be difficult if not impossible for a fire truck to move around all buildings on this site. We will be reviewing this issue with the fire chief prior to the planning commission meeting and can report on it at that time. 7. At the staff review meeting the Police Department representative requested that security lights be placed throughout the site. 8. There appears to be little or no room on the site after the proposed expansion for snow storage. We question where the owner will pile snow. Part of the drainage system through the center of site consists of a concrete valley gutter with a half of percent slope which drains both westerly and then northerly to the railroad property and a portion of it drains east to the neighboring property. If the eastern part of the site is used for snow storage the drainage system will not work in the spring when it may be need most. Also, even if there is no snow stored at this end, off of the end of the concrete valley gutter, there is approximately 80 feet, which is at a grade of just over one percent. We question whether this will adequately drain the site. After the proposed expansion, this site will be nearly all impervious. A great portion of this site is expected to runoff to the east. We also question whether the owner even has the right to send a concentrated flow greater than existing conditions to the east onto a neighboring property. If you have any questions regarding any of these comments, please call. Sincerely, HOWARD R. GREEN COMPANY Terry . aurer, P.E. • o./proj./806510)/0240/510-0312march98 warc R. Green Corncany CONSULTING ENGINEERS