Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Council Minutes <br />July 8, 1985 <br />Page Five <br /> <br />lOA. Report on Status of Cease and Desist Orders on Various Junk Yard Sites for <br />Unlawful use of Property. <br /> <br />Mr. Rick Breezee reported to the Council on various junk yard sites in the <br />City and noted that Mr. Piwowar, owner of one of the sites, has plans for a <br />new structure on the site, but yet does not know if he will follow through on <br />these plans. Also, he poirltedoutthatMr.Piwnwar has requested that the wood <br />debris from his original home be left for fuel for his wood burning stove but <br />that this is nmt acceptable to the City. He noted that the deadline was June 30, <br />1985 for Mr. piwowar to completely clean up his property. He also noted that <br />the Charest property had a June 30th deadline and that Mrs. Charest had been in <br />touch with him regarding the moving of the trailers from the property, but at <br />this point nothing has been done. He noted that Mr. Coyle, of Larkin, Hoffman, <br />will begin processing the Charest site. <br /> <br />Mr~ Breezeenoted Mr. Coyle indicated that if the City would take action they <br />should advertise for bids for the clean up of the Piwowar property. Mayor Hinkle <br />stated that he believed the City should hire the clean up done and assess the <br />property. There was general agreement amoung the Council to this process. <br /> <br />With regard to the Omitt property, Mr. Breezee noted that they complied and <br />that the lean-to has been removed and the animals removed from the front yard <br />of the property. <br /> <br /> <br />As a final note Mr. Breezee pointed out that the John property at Naples and <br />182nd had also been cited for cleanup but at this point nothing had been done <br />on the property. <br /> <br />8. Staff Report on Fair Labor Standards Act. <br /> <br />The City Administrator pointed out thaton February 19, 1985, the US Supreme <br />Court in the Garcia vs. San Antonio Municipal Transit Authority Case ruled that <br />the Fair Labor Standards Act now applies to state and local government. He <br />pointed out that the Fair Labor Standards Act is the Federal Governments basic <br />minimum wage and maximum hour legislation. And that the basic overtime con- <br />cept for nonexempt empl()yeesis. that overtime for work performed 'in excess ;of <br />40 hours per week should be paid in cash rather that comp time and that the <br />basic pay concept is paid for hours worked. Essentially, he pointed out comp <br />time cannot be given in lieu of overtime and the requirements of the Fair Labor <br />Standards Act cannot be waived by an employee, the union or a collective bar- <br />gaining agreement. He pointed out the Fair Labor Standards Act does not ban <br />comp time per se, but simply requires payment of any overtime hours worked in <br />cash. <br /> <br />The City Administrator recommended that under the requirements of the FLSA the <br />City should establish the following provisions for employees: <br /> <br /> 1. Establish a work schedule for each nonexempt employee to determine overtime <br /> liabili ty for the City. <br />. 2. Calculate an hourly rate for all nonexempt employees. <br />3. Establish a policy of paying for overtime hours worked. <br /> <br />l <br /> <br />~ <br />