06-17-1985 CC MIN - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. . ~ City Council Meeting June 17, 1985 Page Five Mr. Santwire presented the following list of proposed uses for the Barrington Square Pud,that had been agreed upon by the residents, developers and Planning Commission at their joint meeting. 1. Retail establishments 2. Personal service establishments 3. Professional and business offices 4. Bank and Financial Institutions 5. Dental and medical clinics 6. Two-family dwellings 7. Mortuaries Mayor Hinkle opened the public hearing. Mr. Earl Hetrick asked that the public hearing be postponed because his attorney was out of town and could not represent him. Mayor Hinkle indicated that he did not feel it would be fair to the petitioner and others present for the public hearing to postpone the hearing. Mrs. Pat Hetrick expressed her feeling that the list did not represent the desires of the residents and was solely the developer's and Planning Commission's list of uses. Chairman Tralle indicated that he was present at the meeting Mrs. Hetrick was referring to and that although all the residents of the area were not present, those that were certainly had input in the discussion and development of the list Qf~.uses. Discussion was carried on regarding the developer's attempts to meet with the residents of Elk Hills. Milo Hennemann questioned whether or not the road easement could be moved from the south of the proposed plat to the northern portion. Mr. Santwire indicated that if the easement were located on Lot 1, Lot 1 would not be buildable. Mayor Hinkle expressed his concern of assessments on outlots and the fact that the City eventually ends up owning these outlots due non-payment of the assessments. Pat Hennemann indicated that in her discussions with Mr. Cliff Lundberg, he had in- dicated that the developer would not have the blessings of the Elk Hills residents until the residents were satisfied with plans for the slope, tress, lighting, etc. Mr. Santwire indicated that he has met with the residents of Elk Hills approximately six times and he cannot be swayed by what the residents tell him to do, and that he must do what he has to within the guidelines of the City's ordinance to make the project work. Further discussion was carried on between,!the residents of Elk Hills and Mr. Santwire regarding Mr. Santwire's attempts to meet with the residents and whether or not proper notice of the meetings was given. Mr. Earl Hetrick expressed his concern that the prOV1Slons of the City's PUD ordinance were not being followed and that he felt the adjacent property and its use as single family residential housing was being adversely affected by the development of the PUD.