Laserfiche WebLink
essential services, aesthetics, screening, dust, litter and other land use impacts. The staff <br /> • recommended conditions in the draft permits address the technical/environmental aspects. <br /> Approval of the proposed amendments will allow the construction of cells 12 and 13. <br /> The specific construction details of each of these additional cells is proposed to be left to <br /> staff approval at a future date, as long as they are consistent with the overall approval <br /> given by the City Council. <br /> Final elevation- In staffs opinion,the most crucial land use issue the Planning <br /> Commission and City Council must consider with regard to the proposed amendments to <br /> the landfill's conditional use permit and license is the final elevation of this facility. The <br /> issue of height has been the subject of much debate and negotiation between city staff and <br /> the landfill. A summary of the discussion is as follows: <br /> • The landfill is currently at a maximum elevation of 1,100 feet above mean sea level <br /> (MSL). <br /> • Plans approved through the current city conditional use permit and license allow the <br /> landfill a final elevation of 1,105 feet. This elevation is consistent with the city's <br /> Environmental Impact Statement(EIS) on mineral excavation. This EIS was done to <br /> provide long range planning for the city's mining district and represents a component <br /> of the city's comprehensive plan. The landfill's property is part of the mining district <br /> and the landfill voluntarily participated in the EIS. Gravel is mined from the landfill <br /> • property prior to it being used as a waste deposit. <br /> • The landfill proposed a revision to their MPCA permit that would allow them to have <br /> side slopes of 3 to 1 versus the normal 5 to 1 side slopes The steeper side slopes <br /> proposed by the landfill could have accommodated an ultimate height in excess of <br /> 1,200 feet. City staff met with representatives of both MPCA and the Elk River <br /> Landfill on January 30, 1997 regarding the 3 to 1 slopes and expressed concerns <br /> about the ultimate height of the landfill. The 3 to 1 side slopes were rejected by <br /> MPCA. <br /> • The landfill submitted a Long Term Development Plan(dated March, 1997) for city <br /> review that proposed a final elevation of 1,170 feet. The cover letter from Victoria <br /> Kreger that accompanied the landfill's submittal, dated March 27, 1997, also <br /> identified 1,170 as the height being requested by the landfill in their MPCA and city <br /> permits. <br /> • In a letter dated March 28, 1997, city staff member Stephen Rohlf expressed concern <br /> over the 1,170 height to MPCA staff. <br /> • In a letter dated March 31, 1997, Greg Korstad, attorney for the landfill, requested <br /> that language in MPCA's permit that referenced the required approval of the ultimate <br /> • landfill height by the City of Elk River and Sherburne County be stricken. <br /> Lanfil97 <br />