Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Board of Equalization Minutes <br />May .J9t 1985 <br />Page Two <br /> <br />1. Richard and Bruce Goetz <br /> <br />Mr. Richard Goetz indicated that he and his son, Bruce, each owned a 20 acre <br />parcel in the South half of the Northwest quarter of Section 1. Mr. Goetz in- <br />dicated that he had paid $20,000 for the 20 acre parcel and that he was being <br />assessed for 19 acres because one acre was taken up by a county road and the <br />assessed valuation for the 19 acres was $22,800. Mr. Goetz further indicated <br />that his son's property was assessed for 20 acres at $24,000. The Goetz's <br />expressed their feeling that the assessed valuation was too high, based on the <br />sale price of the property. <br /> <br />Ty Bischoff indicated that the sale price of one parcel of property did not <br />determine the market value for all parcel of equal size and type in the City. <br />He further stated that the mean is based on many sales of comparable property. <br />Mr. Bischoff explained how agricultural property values were determined and <br />explained the Green Acres process. The Goetz's indicated that they were not <br />aware that they could have maintained Green Acre status on their property. <br />Mr. Bischoff stated that the Green Acres status could have been continued by <br />filing for the continuation within 30 days of the sale. Since this had not <br />been done, they must homestead the property or they must own it for 7 years <br />before they could apply for Green Acres. <br /> <br />Mr. Bischoff indicated that the valuation had already been dropped from $1,500 <br />per acre to $1,100 per acre. <br /> <br />Councilmember Williams questioned the actual dollar amount of difference in <br />taxes payable in 1986, if the property were assessed at $22,800 versus $20,000. <br />Mr. Kritzek indicated that the amount of difference was $75,00. <br /> <br />Mayor Hinkle indicated that he felt the $1,200 per acre was a fair valuation <br />when compared to other 40 acre parcels within the City of Elk River. <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED THAT THE VALUATION FOR THE PROPERTIES OWNED BY <br />RICHARD AND BRUCE GOETZ REMAIN THE SAME. COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT SECONDED THE <br />MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 5-0. <br /> <br />2. Lyman Marshall <br /> <br />Mr. Marshall indicated that he was the owner of a 24-unit apartment building on <br />Baldwin Avenue named Bal-Moral Apartments. Mr. Marshall stated that he had <br />received a 47 percent increase in assessed valuation over 1984. Mr. Marshall <br />stated that the assessed valuation for his property in 1984 was $427,000 and <br />that 1985 assessed valuation was $632,000, a difference of $205,000. <br /> <br />Mr. Bischoff indicated that all the apartment properties in Elk River had been <br />reappraised after prodding by the Department of Revenue for the poor sales ratios. <br />Mr. Bischoff further indicated that a certificate of real estate sales had to be <br />filed with the State of Minnesota Revenue Department when a piece of property <br />was sold. The Certificate of Real Estate Sale shows the purchase price of the <br />property. The sales ratio was approximately 58 percent and should be between <br />80 and 90 percent. <br />