My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.4
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
_Prior to 1999
>
1997
>
02-25-1997
>
6.4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2018 12:17:39 PM
Creation date
4/13/2018 12:17:33 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 2 <br /> July 25, 1995 <br /> • do not meet the minimum requirements of 10,000 square feet in size and 80 feet <br /> of frontage. Gary explained that the majority of the parcels in the Westwood <br /> Subdivision measure 75' wide by 120' - 140' in depth. The applicant can show a <br /> hardship due to the fact that he was assessed by the City for two separate <br /> parcels. Also, the lot size and width would not be out of character within the <br /> Westwood Subdivision. Gary noted that a lot area and lot width variance similar <br /> to this request was approved last year. <br /> Terry Maurer explained the assessment was based on front footage. The <br /> applicant was assessed for 150 feet, based on the fact that there were <br /> potentially two buildable lots. <br /> Chair Kuester opened the public hearing. There being no comments from the <br /> public, Chair Kuester closed the public hearing. <br /> COMMISSION TACHENY MOVED THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMEND <br /> APPROVAL OF THE VARIANCE REQUEST BY DANIEL AND FAITH HANSON, PUBLIC <br /> HEARING CASE NO. V 95-6, BASED ON THE FACT THERE WAS NOT OPPOSITION <br /> DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING AND, BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: <br /> 1. SEVERAL OF THE PARCELS IN THE WESTWOOD SUBDIVISION ARE 75' X 120'; <br /> THEREFORE, THIS REQUEST WOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH THIS SUBDIVISION <br /> AND NOT BE OUT OF CHARACTER WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA. <br /> 2. THE APPLICANT CAN SHOW HARDSHIP IN THE FACT THAT THIS PARCEL WAS <br /> • ASSESSED AS TWO LOTS BY THE CITY WHEN CITY SEWER AND WATER WAS <br /> EXTENDED PAST THE PROPERTY. <br /> 3. THE VARIANCE WOULD NOT BE INJURIOUS OR ADVERSELY AFFECT THE <br /> HEALTH, SAFETY OR WELFARE OF THE RESIDENTS OR NEIGHBORS AND IS IN <br /> KEEPING WITH THE SPIRIT AND INTENT OF THE ORDINANCE. <br /> COMMISSIONER SULLIVAN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 6-0. <br /> 52. Dan Smith/Perkins Restaurant Request for a Conditional Use Permit, Public <br /> Hearing Case No. CU 95-15 <br /> Dan Smith requests a conditional use permit for site plan review to construct a <br /> 4,415 square foot Perkins Family Restaurant & Bakery within the Elk River Retail <br /> Center Planned Unit Development. The restaurant is to be located in the <br /> northeast corner of Elk Hills Drive and U.S. Highway 169. <br /> Staff report by Steve Ach. Steve reviewed information presented in his report to <br /> the Planning Commission regarding the site plan, drainage and utilities, parking, <br /> landscaping, and architecture. Steve suggested consideration be given to the <br /> color scheme, flag pole height and hours of operation. Steve noted that a 70' <br /> flag pole is proposed, and would be higher than other flag poles, signs and <br /> structures along Highway 169. <br /> Daniel Smith, applicant, stated the additional landscaping on the Dodge Street <br /> side and around the refuse collection site was not a problem. He added that the <br /> berm was proposed to be 2-1/2 feet. Mr. Smith requested approval for a 70 foot <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.