Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />City Council Minutes <br />April 15 , 1985 <br />Page Two <br /> <br />4. Pearce Commendation Presentation <br /> <br />Mayor Hinkle called on John Pearce, former Planning Commission member to step for- <br />ward to receive a commendation. Mayor Hinkle publicly read Resolution 85-8 a <br />resolution commending John Pearce for his dedication to community service. John <br />Pearce accepted the framed resolution and publicly thanked the City Council and <br />members of the audience for the opportunity to serve the Elk River community. <br /> <br />5. Open Mike <br /> <br />Mayor Hinkle noted that this was the time to bring up any items not listed on the <br />agenda. <br /> <br />A. Tom Mattson of Twin Lake Road noted that he needed a variance from the six <br />hundred foot requirement and wondered how the variance process could be speeded <br />up. Mr. iRickBreezee, Building and Zoning Administrator was asked to explain <br />the several procedures required. for considering a variance. It was noted that <br />the Planning Commission had a work meeting scheduled for April 30th and that <br />Mr. Mattson's hearing could be published for that meeting. He was advised to <br />make application so the process could be speeded up. <br /> <br />B. Carol Mills, Executive Director of the Guardian Angels Foundation of Elk River, Inc. <br />appeared to advise the Council of the proposed moderate income elderly housing <br />proposed by Guardian Angels. She indicated her conversation with Acting Admini- <br />strato~ Orvil Johnson concerning the feasibility of applying tax increment <br />financing participation by the City. It was noted that the TIF concept would <br />need to be heard by the Planning Commission. It was noted that it should <br />possibly be added to the Planning Commission agenda of April 23rd. After some <br />further discussion it was noted that the Councilmembers were somewhat receptive <br />to TIF concept and that further legal and financing data information should be <br />made available for Council consideration at the meeting of April 22nd. <br /> <br />6. Concept Review Amendment for Elk River Plaza <br /> <br />Councilmember Gunkel introduced the matter of the Elk River Plaza PUD amendment. <br />Mr. John Griese representing Barthel gave a presentation of the original PUD. He <br />noted that reference to Lot F in the original agreement now equates to what is <br />known as Lot 7 and this was all fully covered in the developers agreement. The <br />developer now proposes to plat a street and cul-de-sac into Lot 7 with four indi- <br />vidual lots of approximately 1.5 acres each. He noted that a Goodyear Service <br />Store had expressed interest in building. <br /> <br />Members of the Council reviewed the uses that were not allowed in this PUD. It <br />was noted that a number of downtown uses would not be allowed and these include <br />such items as multi-family dwellings, professional offices, taverns.and hotels, <br />motor vehicle service stations servicing vehicles with more than two axles, auto <br />repair shops, drive-in theaters, out-door amusement centers. Counci1members also <br />noted that a buffer area is needed between Lot 7 and the Guardian Angels complex. <br />It is noted that buffering protection was covered in the original developers agree- <br />ment. Councilmemeber Gunkel expressed questions about developing Lot 7 at this time. <br />