My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
13
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
_Prior to 1999
>
1997
>
01-11-1997
>
13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2018 11:55:42 AM
Creation date
4/13/2018 11:55:27 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> • <br /> ofPo tential controversies. Other places,the requires.Otherwise,cellular licensees risk the <br /> panelist noted,are attempting to simply outlaw FCC denying their license renewal applications <br /> towers.This may result in federal-state tensions, for failing to improve their systems to meet the <br /> however,as the next section will discuss. public's increased demand for service. <br /> 3. FCC Requirements of Cellular Licensees If the FCC denies an incumbent's renewal appli- <br /> Under the Communications Act,the FCC can cation on this basis,the newcomer will face the <br /> only license radio transmission facilities for a same burden of installing additional base stations <br /> during its first license term.The newcomer's failure <br /> specific period of years.This is true of cellular <br /> telephone networks and all broadcast radio and to do so will imperil its own chances for a license <br /> renewal.The FCC's rules and regulations,there <br /> television stations.As Symposium participants <br /> observed,during the term of its license,any fore,codify a strong Federal interest in the <br /> licensee must operate its licensed facilities in the construction of new base stations to meet the <br /> public interest as the trustee of a public trust. public'sis <br /> demand for service.Moreover,a petition <br /> Incumbent licensees may seek renewal of their Pending before the FCC for a ruling preempting <br /> local <br /> licenses as their current terms expire,but their officials from adopting unnecr-cvary burdens <br /> on the placement of new base station facilities. <br /> renewal applications may draw challenges by <br /> overfilers. FCC practice is to give worthy incum- 4. Distinguishing RF from ELF <br /> bent licensees a renewal expectancy.A renewal <br /> One participant,although noting the very different <br /> expectancy is the most important factor the FCC <br /> considers in determining whether to grant the technologies involved in cellular transmissions <br /> incumbent licensee's renewal application,or to and power lines,asked two questions.One,to <br /> instead grant a new license to the overfiler.The what extent will the type of litigation on ELF and <br /> assertions of reduced property values come the RF <br /> Commission's conferral of a renewal expectancy <br /> depends on the licensee's stewardship of its portion field?Second,to what extent do health effects <br /> of the radio spectrum during the most recent issues raised with respect to ELF translate into the <br /> RF arena? <br /> license term. <br /> Section 22.941 of the FCC's Rules and Regulations One panelist immediately noted the vast differ- <br /> sets explicit standards for determining whether ences between the two contexts and the impor- <br /> any cellular licensee is entitled to a renewal tante of maintaining the clear distinctions <br /> between the two.The participant who posed the <br /> expectancy. Under that rule,the incumbent must question noted significant litigation in the ELF <br /> demonstrate,among other things,that it: <br /> arena and questioned to what extent one could <br /> 1. has substantially used its spectrum for its distinguish RF from ELF in discussions of health <br /> intended purpose;and effects and property values. <br /> 2. has substantially complied with applicable <br /> Commission rules,policies,and the Participants and panelists had a variety of opinions. <br /> Communications Act. One participant noted that electric utilities would <br /> do well to reduce exposures to the very low levels <br /> As part of its showing,the licensee must submit: of RF from base stations.Another,responding to <br /> a. a description of its current service area in the statements made on RF and ELF,made three <br /> terms of geographic coverage and population points.First,most residents'key objection to base <br /> served,as well as the system's ability to accom- stations was simply nor wanting to see a tower. <br /> modate the needs of roamers(transient cellular Second,people are concerned about potential or <br /> users in the system's service area who are actually feared risks,not just demonstrable risks.The par- <br /> subscribers in distant cellular networks);and ticipant's final point was that her company(a <br /> b. an explanation of its record of expansion, cellular carrier)had hired real estate appraisers at <br /> including a timetable of the construction of various locations to discern any effects by base <br /> new cell sites(base stations)to meet changes stations on housing prices.The studies had found <br /> in demand for cellular radio service. that,in every case,housing prices near the towers <br /> had at least kept pace with the real estate market4111/ <br /> Clearly,the FCC intends cellular networks to for the general area. <br /> construct new base stations as the growth in traffic <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.