My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.3, 6.4
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
_Prior to 1999
>
1996
>
09-24-1996
>
6.3, 6.4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2018 9:50:24 AM
Creation date
4/13/2018 9:50:22 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memo to Planning Commission <br /> Page 2 <br /> September 24, 1996 <br /> • To date the applicant has provided a contract for deed for the adjacent property <br /> to the south, Lot 4, Block 1, Avon Acres 4th Addition. The contract indicates that <br /> the applicant will own the property by October 1996. However, the applicant has <br /> indicated that he does not plan on combining the lots. <br /> The applicant has indicated that he has not contacted the owner of the property <br /> to the north regarding access. The applicant does not wish to utilize the <br /> neighboring driveway to access to rear of his lot. <br /> The applicant has provided a grading and drainage plan. The plan covers the <br /> rear of the site in the area surrounding the proposed warehouse. The grading <br /> plan has been forwarded to the City Engineer for his review and comment. <br /> The applicant has not provided a revised landscaping plan. It is staff's <br /> understanding that the applicant would like to proceed with the landscaping <br /> shown on the existing site plan. <br /> In summary, the applications and site plan before the Commission are <br /> essentially unchanged from what was proposed back in July. The only additional <br /> information is the grading and drainage plan for the rear of the lot. Since the <br /> • applicant does not plan on combining the 2 lots, staff is reviewing this proposal <br /> as a final product without any future expansion. <br /> Variance Request <br /> With the exception of pavement within 10 feet of the property line along the <br /> north side of the existing building, staff does not believe that the variance <br /> requests meet the 5 standards required to grant a variance. Regarding the <br /> variance request for pavement within 10 feet of the property line along the north <br /> side of the existing building, the location of the building, the narrowness of the <br /> lot and topography make access to the rear of the lot difficult at best. <br /> Regarding the other variance requests for parking and access setbacks, curbing <br /> and architectural requirements, there does not appear to be any physical, <br /> topographic or vegetative constraints that would prevent the applicant from <br /> complying with the zoning code requirements. <br /> This property is under consideration for rezoning to light industrial. If the <br /> rezoning is approved, curbing will not be required in the rear of the existing <br /> building except to control drainage. In addition, the architectural requirement of <br /> 75% of the exterior of the proposed building consisting of material on the <br /> • approved exterior material list will be reduced to 25%. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.