My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.5, 5.6, 5.7
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
_Prior to 1999
>
1996
>
07-23-1996
>
5.5, 5.6, 5.7
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2018 11:39:46 AM
Creation date
4/13/2018 9:28:19 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Mr. Steve Ach <br /> July 17, 1996 <br /> Page Two <br /> • It would seem appropriate to continue the curb and gutter along many of <br /> these driveways as they access more than one building. We would <br /> recommend that the Developers work with City staff to try to determine <br /> a reasonable amount of additional curb and gutter. <br /> • The street section shown for the internal roads is appropriate. Even <br /> though the roads will be considered private, they will still carry the same <br /> traffic a public road would see. We would suggest some consideration be <br /> given to slightly increasing the amount of Class 5. We believe that four <br /> inches of aggregate base is a minimal amount and five or six inches would <br /> be more desirable. An offsetting decrease in the amount of bituminous by <br /> approximately 1/2-inch would be appropriate. <br /> B. PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN <br /> • We have reviewed the Grading Plan as far as possible, but until <br /> information regarding first floor elevations for the proposed buildings is <br /> provided, we cannot complete the review. <br /> • In the southeast corner of the development, there appear to be relatively <br /> • flat grades. Additional spot elevations would be helpful in determining if <br /> this area will work. <br /> • In the northern part of the development, there are drainage patterns <br /> crossing lots outside of normal utility easements. There will either need <br /> to be additional easements granted here, unless this common area has <br /> blanket drainage easements. <br /> • In the extreme northeast corner, the 962 and 964 contours appear to be <br /> missing. <br /> • In the extreme northwestern part of the development, it is unclear how the <br /> filling of the area and the creation of the relatively steep bank will tie in <br /> to the existing park area to the west. Will a retaining wall be needed here? <br /> • At about the middle of the development on the extreme west side, there is <br /> a hole at 937.54, which is not proposed to be filled. The question arises <br /> as to what happens to this area. Also,just north of this point there are two <br /> existing 942 contours. It is not clear what happens to these. <br /> • In the southwest portion of the development, there are four single-family <br /> lots in a relatively heavily wooded portion of the property, which <br /> according to the grading plan are to remain relatively intact. However, to <br /> complete the review of this area and the single family along the north <br /> frontage on 193rd Avenue NW, we need information relative to house <br /> types and elevations. <br /> • <br /> 230/261-1517.jul <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.