5.13 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

71 N.W. 703 (1897). In Bloomington, pawnbrokers are required to Provide the police department with a daily computer disc containing • descriptions of the property purchased or pawned, together with information regarding the person selling or pawning the item. This information is then compared with metropolitan stolen property reports. J. Property Distribution Provisions An innocent pawnbroker who gave money for a pledge of stolen property has an interest in property protected by due process and section 1983, which may be violated when police recover property and return it to the true owner without judicial determination of ownership or possession prior to property's return or release as required by state law. See Wolfenbarger v. Williams, 774 F.2d 358 (10th Cir. 1985). See also G& G Jewelry, Inc. v. City of Oakland, 989 F.2d 1093 (9th Cir. 1993)(pawnbroker, as pledgee, has legitimate possessory interest in property received as against the rest of the world except persons having title to the property; the police are not authorized to seize property from a pawnbroker for the purpose of returning it to the person who claims to be the owner in circumvention of required statutory procedure). But see Minn. Stat. sec. 609.523 (1994)(law enforcement agency which is holding property over which a person is alleged to have exerted unauthorized control or to have otherwise obtained unlawfully may return that property to its owner if the four conditions detailed in the statute are met). Provided police officers follow the Minnesota statute, the city should be protected from a due process challenge to its actions in recovering stolen property from a pawnbroker.