Laserfiche WebLink
Memo to Planning Commission Page 3 <br /> April 23, 1996 <br /> operations; the feedlot operation includes all the supporting farmland as well as <br /> • the structures. <br /> Amend the Zoning Ordinance so that Feedlots are a Conditional Use in the I1 <br /> Zone <br /> This alternative involves proceeding with the rezoning request as proposed, but <br /> also amending the zoning ordinance to include feedlots as a conditional use in <br /> the light industrial zone. This alternative would allow the rezoning to proceed as <br /> proposed, ensuring that the zoning of the parcel is consistent with the land use <br /> designation of light industrial and reflecting the type of development that is <br /> often associated with land located within the urban service area. It would also be <br /> consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and maintain <br /> the Cargill Nutrition Center as a conforming use. <br /> Since this alternative involves amending the zoning ordinance so that feedlots <br /> are a conditional use in the light industrial zone, a determination should be <br /> made regarding whether a feedlot, which many would consider an agricultural <br /> use, is an appropriate use for the light industrial zone. <br /> Maintain Existing Rla Zoning <br /> • This alternative consists of keeping the existing Rla zoning in place. The entire <br /> Cargill facility would stay a conforming use. Maintaining the existing Ria <br /> zoning would reflect the existing use of the property and, in light of the recent <br /> conditional use permit issued to upgrade the facility, the future long range use of <br /> the parcel and most of uses allowed under the Rla zone are compatible with the <br /> adjacent Kelly Farm property. <br /> However, maintaining the existing zoning would not be consistent with the land <br /> use map, which designates this parcel as light industrial not low density <br /> residential. When property is within the urban service area, as this parcel is, <br /> development of the parcel is generally more intense than that normally <br /> associated with low density residential development. This alternative is also <br /> inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan's section on industrial development. <br /> The plan calls for expansion of industrial opportunities in the southeast sector <br /> and in areas that are within the urban service area; this is one of the few parcels <br /> that qualify. If this parcel is left as Rla, other potential industrial property, that <br /> meets the goals and policies found in the Comprehensive Plan, should be <br /> identified and the boundary of the urban service area may have to be adjusted so <br /> that this parcel in not included. <br /> • <br /> s:\planning\scott\zc96-10b.doc <br />