My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
_Prior to 1999
>
1996
>
02-15-1996
>
4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/9/2018 4:38:23 PM
Creation date
4/9/2018 2:19:05 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
who visited that park during the past twelve months. Lions Park <br /> 0 ranked second at a usage rate of sixty-six percent. <br /> located at the schools drew visitors from fftyone erce <br /> rnittiof <br /> of <br /> the households in Elk River. Handke Outdoor Ice Arenaandt the <br /> softball complex attracted members of about forty percent of the <br /> households in the city during the past year. Woodland . Trails <br /> Park, virtually undeveloped, was visited by only ten percent of <br /> the sample's households. While Orono Park is the pre-eminent <br /> facility in the park system, Lions Park and school-based <br /> offerings also serve large segments of the community. <br /> Park visitors were queried about the types of recreational <br /> facilities they used most frequently. Most respondents reported <br /> passively walking around the park they visited. But, the <br /> swimming beach was used on at least an occasional basis by sixty <br /> percent of the households in the city. Softball fields and play <br /> equipment served about forty percent of the households. The <br /> picnic pavillions, sliding hills, and soccer fields possessed a <br /> smaller, but significant audience within Elk River. <br /> In <br /> comparison with other communities, Elk River residents use the <br /> park and recreational facilities in atypically high numbers. <br /> The City received kudos for its maintenance and upkeep of <br /> the park facilities. Eighty-eight percent approved of the city's <br /> efforts, while only eight percent expressed disapproval. As for <br /> unmet needs, only trails were mentioned frequently enough, at <br /> Iliseven percent, to warrant further study. <br /> The residents were asked their opinion of a more extensive <br /> trail system to link the city's neighborhoods. The concept was <br /> favored by a large seventy-six percent majority. However, when <br /> the subject of property tax increases to pay for its development <br /> was raised, half of the support changed opinions: a forty <br /> percent to thirty-eight percent negative verdict occurred. There <br /> would be substantial difficulty, consequently, in passing a <br /> referendum at this time. <br /> A nearly similar pattern emerged on the question of a <br /> downtown river walk. Seventy-three percent favored the concept. <br /> But, if property tax increases would be required to fund the <br /> construction, then a forty-four percent to thirty-seven percent <br /> plurality emerged in favor of the project. This project would be <br /> viable at the polls, but a highly effective and aggressive <br /> campaign would be needed to carry the day. <br /> Residents felt strongly, however, about the characteristics <br /> of any trail system in Elk River. Seventy-six percent felt it <br /> should serve both pedestrians and bicyclists. Seventy percent <br /> wanted to see the recently purchased abandoned railroad corridor <br /> developed into a component of the system. And, surprisingly, <br /> one-half of the residents would grant the City an e..-sement if the <br /> II, trail system ran by their property. Reinforcing these results, <br /> trails were also narrowly designated the priority for <br /> development, edging smaller neighborhood parks and outdistancing <br /> larger community playfields. The Concept, then, is highly <br /> 133 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.