My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
_Prior to 1999
>
1996
>
02-15-1996
>
Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/9/2018 2:03:13 PM
Creation date
4/9/2018 2:03:11 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br /> November 21, 1995 <br /> Table 2 shows the various trip generation rates that were used in Elk River. <br /> • Two residential rates were used: one, 9.0 trips per household if the average <br /> household size in the TAZ was greater than 3.0 people, and the other, 8.5 <br /> trips per household for TAZs with average household sizes of 3.0 or less. <br /> Two rates were used to reflect the tendency of larger households to <br /> generate more trips. <br /> The generation rate for low density highway commercial was considerably <br /> lower than the rate for general highway commercial. This was meant to <br /> reflect on those areas further from the core of the City that are zoned <br /> highway commercial but have less intense land uses than general retail, <br /> such as auto dealerships and other showrooms. <br /> External trip generation was handled in an entirely different manner. Each <br /> important road crossing the City border was considered an external zone. <br /> The existing rip generation for each of these zones was simply the existing <br /> traffic volume count on that road at the City border. To estimate the <br /> external volumes at the point in time when ultimate development in the City <br /> of Elk River is achieved, the year of ultimate development had to be <br /> estimated. This was done by calculating the annual average population <br /> growth rate needed to achieve the U.S. Census Bureau year 2000 <br /> population projection and determining the number of years needed at this <br /> • growth rate to reach the estimated ultimate population. Since it is <br /> reasonable to assume that the annual percentage growth rate will decrease <br /> as the City approaches ultimate development, some years were added to the <br /> calculated number. The result was an estimate of ultimate development in <br /> 40 years. Realistically this is not likely to occur since gravel miners will <br /> probably still be operating in the northern part of the City in 40 years, and <br /> therefore large areas that are zoned residential will not yet be built upon. <br /> However, it is a reasonable time frame for the planning purpose of <br /> estimating external traffic volumes. <br /> A relationship was established between estimated population growth in the <br /> City of Elk River and counties around Elk River, and growth of external <br /> traffic volumes. Population forecasts from the State Demography Unit <br /> publication entitled "Minnesota Population Projections 1980-2010" were <br /> obtained for Sherburne, Wright, Hennepin, Anoka, Mille Lacs, Stearns and <br /> Benton Counties. Trends in population change were extended to the year <br /> 2030 for each county. For each external zone, the county population <br /> forecasts were used in varying degrees in conjunction with Elk River <br /> population forecasts to estimate traffic volume changes. Volume changes <br /> were calculated separately for external-external (E-E) and external-internal <br /> (E-I) trips (see Section II.C.2, Trip Distribution, for discussion of E-E and <br /> • E-I trips). <br /> CTP-230.156 -5- 230-156-80 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.