My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7.17
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
_Prior to 1999
>
1996
>
02-27-1996
>
7.17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/9/2018 1:59:17 PM
Creation date
4/9/2018 1:59:12 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memo to City Council and Planning Commission Page 4 <br /> February 19, 1996 <br /> School District has had temporary buildings out in front of their high school • <br /> for the past 15 years. I've also heard "temporary" discussed as one or two <br /> years; so the point is, it is very difficult to define temporary and even more <br /> difficult to come up with a finite list of uses that could be considered as <br /> temporary. Therefore, from an administration standpoint, the whole concept <br /> of temporary becomes very subjective and difficult to interpret, as well as <br /> enforce. <br /> The most common method used by cities to identify allowable uses prior to <br /> city water and sewer is to allow uses commonly found in a low density <br /> residential or agricultural zoning district. These cities will have properties <br /> that are presently not served with city water and sewer, zoned as a holding <br /> district or, in Elk River's case, Rla or A-1. This method of establishing a <br /> zoning designation, along with a specific list of allowable uses, clearly <br /> identifies how property, whether it be residential, commercial or industrial, <br /> can be used prior to city water and sewer. <br /> The difficulty Elk River has is that a majority of the property is currently <br /> zoned for its ultimate use. Therefore, trying to implement the system <br /> described above may be very difficult given our current situation. The option <br /> Elk River may wish to pursue is amending the zoning ordinance to identify <br /> certain uses such as those found in the A-1 or Rla zoning district, that can be • <br /> used on properties zoned commercial and industrial that do not have city <br /> water and sewer. <br /> Can there be a compromise to allow development prior to water and <br /> sewer? <br /> Compromise on this particular issue goes beyond having a property owner or <br /> developer waive their rights to future assessments and guaranteeing hook up <br /> to utilities when available. These arrangements are well intended when <br /> executed, however, for some reason, be it time, change of property owners, or <br /> whatever, inevitably the City Council is confronted with an emotional and <br /> difficult issue. It is at this point that all previous bets are off and reality <br /> takes over. At this point, property owners and City Council are sitting across <br /> the table from one another discussing the actual costs and hardships that <br /> may result. <br /> Summary <br /> Growth management is a proven method throughout the country that cities <br /> have adopted in order to reduce public costs, managed traffic, preserve <br /> farmland, protect against environmental problems, and simply maintain a <br /> quality of life for the community. Although growth management is viewed as • <br /> s:\council\gmp.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.