My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7.17
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
_Prior to 1999
>
1996
>
02-27-1996
>
7.17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/9/2018 1:59:17 PM
Creation date
4/9/2018 1:59:12 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memo to City Council and Planning Commission Page 2 <br /> February 19, 1996 <br /> • What ordinances are in place controlling the growth of residential <br /> development? <br /> The intent of the ordinance for all property zoned residential within the <br /> urban service area is to have these areas developed as urban sized lots <br /> (10,000-14,000 square feet). What is not clearly stated in the ordinance is the <br /> minimum lot size if a property owner wanted to subdivide residential <br /> property prior to city water and sewer. As staff has stated in the past, under <br /> these conditions, the minimum lot size should be kept as large as possible (10 <br /> acres) to provide for the efficient extension of utilities at a later date. <br /> The second problem that currently exists is that the newly expanded urban <br /> service area between County Road 12/13 is zoned Rla. This zoning • <br /> designation allows a minimum lot size of 2-1/2 acres. Assuming this area <br /> will ultimately be developed with city water and sewer, the zoning and/or <br /> minimum lot size will have to be increased for the reasons stated above. <br /> In no way are these proposed increases in the minimum lot size suggesting - <br /> that no one can subdivide their property. This merely is an attempt to _ . - <br /> manage the subdivision of land and preserve the opportunities for either the - <br /> • city or landowner (developer) to extend utilities in an efficient manner. <br /> Why not allow commercial and industrial development to occur prior <br /> to having city water and sewer available? <br /> First of all, it is important to highlight the size and geographic area of the <br /> urban service boundary. If commercial and industrial development had no <br /> boundaries, there would be no management to this growth pattern. <br /> Development could occur in a scattered/random pattern throughout the entire <br /> urban service district. Secondly, it should be made clear that commercial and <br /> industrial development can occur without city water and sewer. This has <br /> happened along east Highway 10 for years. It is also happening along <br /> Highway 101 between Rogers and Elk River as well as though the City of <br /> Ramsey. However, this type of development can be different than what may <br /> be found in a sewer and water area. If development without water and sewer <br /> was to occur, several questions would need to be asked: <br /> • How difficult will it be for the city or landowners to extend utilities <br /> at a later date given the existing business that may be in place? <br /> • Why would property owners near the edge of the urban service <br /> district have any interest in developing with city water and sewer? <br /> • <br /> s:\council\gmp.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.