Laserfiche WebLink
Memo to Planning Commission Page 3 <br /> Case No.V 96-1 <br /> February 27, 1996 <br /> • 1. Literal enforcement of the Ordinance will not cause undue hardship for <br /> the applicant since they already have one garage and complying with <br /> the 30 foot front yard setback will still allow for 70 feet between the <br /> house and the proposed second garage. <br /> 2. There are no special conditions such as topography, vegetation or <br /> existing structures which are peculiar to this property. <br /> 3. Literal application of the Ordinance will not deprive the applicant of <br /> property rights enjoyed by other properties in this neighborhood. <br /> 4. There are no special conditions or circumstances that are not a <br /> consequence of the applicant's actions. <br /> 5. The granting of this variance would not be in keeping with the <br /> character of the neighborhood or the spirit or intent of the Ordinance. <br /> • <br /> • <br /> s:\planning\scott\v96-1.doc <br />