12-15-1986 CC MIN - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Page 3 e City Council Minutes December 15, 1986 6.3. Deerfield 3rd Addition Change Orders The City Engineer stated that a change order for extra work performed is being presented to the City Council which will extend the completion date for street construction on the Deerfield 3rd Project until June 13, 1987 and this change order for extra work is in the amount of $11,583.90 to Kenko Inc. Mr. Maurer further explained the reasons for the extension of the completion date and stated that he felt the delay was not the fault of Kenko but of the excavators hired by the developer. COUNCILMEMBER TRALLE MOVED TO APPROVE THE CHANGE ORDER IN THE AMOUNT OF $11,583.90 TO KENKO, INC~ COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM SECONDED THE MOTION, THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. 6.2. Partial Pay Estimate to Kenko Construction Mr. Maurer stated that Kenko was requesting pay estimate #4 in the amount of $31,187.15. He indicated that the pay estimate included the change order, approximately $11,000 in gravel work and approximately $9,000 in storm sewer work. Mr. Maurer stated that all the work has been inspected and he is recommending approval of the pay estimate. e COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM MOVED APPROVAL OF PAY ESTIMATE fJ4 TO KENKO, INC. FOR WORK ON THE DEERFIELD 3RD PROJECT, IN THE AMOUNT OF $31,187.15. COUNCILMEMBER TRALLE SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. 7.1. Shopping Center Expansion Site Plan Review Mr. Dick Nelson. architect for Barthel, Inc. presented the site plan to the City Council regarding the proposed expansion on the shopping center, Lot 1, Block 1, Elk River Plaza 2nd Addition. He indicated the proposal is for 5 theaters on the east of the building and pizza parlor and retail sales on the west side. He stated loading would be in the front of the store because the theaters are in the rear. Discussion was held regarding the loading in the front. Mayor Hinkle stated he would rather see the loading in the rear of the shopping center. Mr. Barthel stated that he felt something could be worked out to change the plans to include loading from the rear. Councilmember Tralle questioned why the walkway leading to the expansion was not going to be enclosed. Mr. Barthel stated that the owners of the Theater did not want to see this enclosed and felt if it were not enclosed it would possibly keep people from loitering in the lobby area. e Councilmember Gunkel stated that in 1985, the Planning Commission passed a motion stipulating the enclosed walkway between the Pamida and shopping center. She further noted that in 1985 an amendment was made to the developer's agreement which states that full development of the mall will result in an enclosed shopping center. Councilmember Gunkel noted that this new proposal is digressing from the orignial proposal.