My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.6 PCSR 09-26-1995
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
_Prior to 1999
>
1995
>
09-26-1995
>
5.6 PCSR 09-26-1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2018 10:19:59 AM
Creation date
4/6/2018 2:47:22 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
amendment to his Conditional Use Permit which would allow him to keep both <br /> • horses on the property. <br /> Analysis <br /> Agricultural Uses are a conditional use in the R1-a zone for parcels under 5 <br /> acres in size. The Barents property is 3.66 acres, but 1.03 acres is in the <br /> highway R.O.W. Therefore, the property only has 2.63 usable acres. The City <br /> Ordinance limits the number of horses allowed to one (1) horse per acre of <br /> pasture land, as per MPCA standards. The Barents currently have just under 1 <br /> acre of pasture. <br /> The Planning Commission should again look at the seven (7) standards for a <br /> conditional use permit as found in the Elk River City Ordinance Section 900.42. <br /> Staff has a couple of concerns with the addition of another horse to the property. <br /> The City Ordinance says that the standard is one horse per acre of pasture land, <br /> by allowing the second horse on this property, the number of horses would <br /> exceed the MPCA standards as well as the City Ordinance. The biggest concern <br /> with allowing two (2) horses on less than one acre of pasture land is the odor <br /> and waste associated with the addition of the second horse. Staff requested <br /> that Mr. Barents provide the City with information on how the additional waste <br /> • would be handled, but we did not receive that information. <br /> The complaint received by the City regarding this property was not a complaint <br /> about odor, rather, it was about the number of horses on the property. The <br /> complainant felt that the City was inconsistent in enforcing its ordinances and <br /> granting Conditional Use Permits. Staff has not received any other complaints <br /> about the property. However, the property to the west of Tyler Street is zoned <br /> Ric with city sewer and water. While odor has not become a concern yet, as this <br /> area develops, two agricultural animals on a property this size could become an <br /> even greater issue. <br /> Recommendation <br /> In Staffs opinion, this request does not meet the seven standards for granting a <br /> conditional use permit and, therefore, recommends denial of the Conditional Use <br /> Amendment to allow a second horse on the property based on the following <br /> findings: <br /> 1. The addition of the second horse will exceed the MPCA standard of <br /> one horse per acre of pasture land. If the amendment is granted, it <br /> will double the number of horses per acre and could detrimentally <br /> • affect the use and enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood. <br /> S:\PLANNING\KENDRA\CU95-21.DOC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.