My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.9 PCSR 08-22-1995
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
_Prior to 1999
>
1995
>
08-22-1995
>
5.9 PCSR 08-22-1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2018 2:34:46 PM
Creation date
4/6/2018 2:34:45 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> As a point of clarification, an improved surface has been interpreted as a <br /> dust-free all-weather surface which does include Class 5. <br /> The rationale for the 5' driveway setback which was alluded to in the July <br /> 25, 1995 memo the Planning Commission is to keep a minimal buffer strip <br /> around the property and also, to keep driveways outside of drainage and <br /> utility easements. When a driveway is placed within a drainage and utility <br /> easement, at times a drainage problem may result as water from an adjacent <br /> parcel can be directed on a neighboring property. Keeping driveways outside <br /> of the drainage and utility easements will also help if maintenance is <br /> required in the easement area, and a portion of the driveway needs to be <br /> removed, by limiting disputes as to who has to replace the driveway. <br /> This ordinance amendment is mainly directed toward newly constructed <br /> driveways and should not cause a hardship for most parcels, due to the fact <br /> that the great majority of the driveways in Elk River already meet a 5' side <br /> and rear lot setback. However, the driveway setback may lessen the <br /> potential land use conflicts for the few driveways that are proposed to be <br /> constructed very close to or on the side or rear lot lines. <br /> • Recommendation <br /> Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the <br /> code amendments as proposed in the attached ordinance. <br /> • <br /> s:PLANNING:PC:OA95-10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.