5.4 PCSR 06-27-1995 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• Mr. Steve Ach June 22, 1995 Page Two 3. The submittal package did not contain any grading or drainage information. Prior to final approval, a plan showing the proposed elevations of the site should be submitted. Also, a drainage plan showing the runoff from the site being picked up internally will need to be provided. As we indicated to Mr. Beaudry, we will be reviewing the capacity of the existing storm sewer on Proctor Avenue. If by chance there is a limited capacity for runoff from this project, there may need to be a minor amount of on-site ponding. 4. As you are aware, Proctor Avenue is a County road. Therefore, this plan should also be submitted to the Sherburne County Engineer for their review. 5. We also discussed with Mr. Beaudry the existing large mature trees located along the east and north boundaries of the site. He indicated he would be sensitive to the trees along the east side and intends to save the majority of the trees along the north side. His Grading and Drainage Plan showing existing elevations and proposed elevations should also include the exact location and diameter of these major trees relative to his proposed construction. • It appears that Mr. Beaudry has a workable plan for developing this piece of property. However, there should be additional information provided as indicated relative to elevations and, as we discussed with Mr. Beaudry, additional thought should be given to driveway locations, traffic patterns, and user locations. Mr. Beaudry did indicate that he is willing to reanalyze these. As long as he is willing to work with staff on these issues, I believe that these can be resolved as the project works its way through the City process. If you have any questions regarding any of these comments, please call. Sincerely, MSA, CONSULTING ENGINEERS Terry J. Maurer, P.E. TJM:tw 275-2201.jun •