Laserfiche WebLink
Memo to Planning Commission Page 2 <br /> February 27, 1995 <br /> • both Manor Place and Norfolk Avenue. The home which faces on Norfolk <br /> Avenue is set back fifty-four (54) feet from the front property line along <br /> Norfolk Avenue and thirty-two (32) feet from the front property line along <br /> Manor Place. The topography of the site falls seven (7) feet from the <br /> northwest corner to the south lot line along Manor Place. A 10' foot variance <br /> would mean that the home would be located 22' feet from the front property <br /> line along Manor Place. <br /> Existing Neighborhood <br /> Most of the homes in this immediate area were constructed from the 1920's <br /> through the 1940's. There are very few records from this time period showing <br /> when these homes were constructed. Through the aid of aerial photographs, <br /> it appears that several of the homes were constructed very close to the side <br /> property lines. In fact, the neighboring home to the north of the subject site <br /> appears to be located approximately five (5) feet from the subject site's north <br /> property line. Therefore, it appears that some precedent for decreased side <br /> setbacks has been established in this older neighborhood. However, it does <br /> appear that most of the homes meet the existing front yard setback <br /> requirements from Norfolk Avenue. The applicant's parcel is a corner lot <br /> which is required to meet the front yard setback on both frontages which <br /> • leaves fewer options for the applicant. <br /> Analysis <br /> Staff refers the Planning Commission to Section 900.40 in the City of Elk <br /> River Code of Ordinance for the five standards to consider when reviewing a <br /> variance. Staff also refers the Commission to Mr. Schumacher's letter <br /> addressing the issues and five standards. Staff feels that there are adequate <br /> findings to grant the eight (8) foot front yard setback variance. The applicant <br /> and staff discussed several different options for an addition which would not <br /> need a variance, however, as noted in the applicant's letter, these locations <br /> did not work for a variety of reasons, namely that the colonial style <br /> architecture would be jeopardized with a poorly placed addition. There is also <br /> precedence established in this older neighborhood where several structures <br /> are non-conforming in terms of existing setback standards. Therefore, the <br /> proposed setbacks would not be out of character with the general area. <br /> Although alternative sites exist for placing the family room addition without <br /> the need for a variance, it would jeopardize the unique colonial architecture <br /> associated with this home. Mr. Schumacher's home was constructed before <br /> any of the current setback standards were in place and it is extremely <br /> difficult to modify his home without jeopardizing the architecture and meet <br /> • all the current setbacks. The topography and location of the existing <br /> c:planning:pc:v95-1 <br />