Laserfiche WebLink
Public Hearing Case Page6 <br /> CU94-32 Continued <br /> • recommendation to have 3:1 slopes accomplished by the end of each <br /> construction season. However, the Planning Commission should <br /> consider whether or not warning signs are adequate adjacent to the <br /> active face of this operation or if fencing is needed. <br /> RECOMMENDATION <br /> As indicated, Mr. Plaisted started mining in this area in 1961. Staff is <br /> appreciative of Mr. Plaisted's cooperation with the City through the <br /> Environmental Impact Statement process and also updating his Conditional <br /> Use Permit. We are recommending approval of Mr. Plaisted's Conditional <br /> Use Permit, with the following findings and conditions: <br /> Findings <br /> 1. That the conditions placed on the operation adequately protect <br /> adjacent neighborhoods and the City form detrimental affects <br /> from the operation due to excessive traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, <br /> glare, odor, dust, or vibrations. <br /> 2. That the operation will not result in a loss of a natural, scenic, <br /> • or historic features of major importance. <br /> 3. That the proposal is consistent with the City of Elk River's <br /> Comprehensive Plan, Mineral Excavation Ordinance, Zoning <br /> Ordinance, and Environmental Impact Statement on mineral <br /> excavation. <br /> 4. That the conditions placed on the operation require it to comply <br /> with all appropriate City, State, and Federal requirements. <br /> • <br />