09-08-1986 CC MIN - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Page 3 e City Council Minutes September 8. 1986 COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM MOVED TO APPOINT LORI JOHNSON AS ACTING CITY ADMINISTRATOR IN THE ABSENCE OF PATRICK KLAERS. CITY ADMINISTRATOR. AS THE NEED ARISES. COUNCILMEMBER TRALLE SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. 5. Bid Award for Proposed Public Works Facility e Phil Hals. Street Superintendent. and Mr. Hal Pierce. Architectural consultant. explained the bid process and the reason for the City to act as the general contractor. Mr. Hals explained the highlights of his memo to the Mayor and City Council dated September 5. 1986. which was inadvertently not sent out in the City Council packet of information. which is attached to and a part of these official minutes. Mr. Hals stated that the low bidder was Wells Concrete at a cost of $107.550. which is for a building shell and roof of precast concrete. Mr. Hals further stated that Wells could pour the walls mid October and have the walls standing by mid November. Mr. Hals explained that additional cost include. costs for the foundation. insulation and interior walls. Mr. Hals further explained that they only received one bid for the foundation for $17.300 and that they are considering a re-bid. Mr. Hals noted that the next bid package will be for the electricl. heating. plumbing. doors. and windows. etc. Mayor Hinkle questioned whether or not the additional costs beyond the building shell itself could be kept under $100.000. Mr Hals stated that he felt that would not be a problem. COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 86-64. A RESOLUTION AWARDING THE CONTRACT FOR THE PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY BUILDING SHELL TO THE LOW BIDDER. WELLS CONCRETE. IN THE AMOUNT OF $107.550. COUNCILMEMBER TRALLE SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. 6. MPCA Consideration of UPA Air Emission Facility Permit Mr. Klaers explained that the City's Building and Zoning Administrator. Steve Rohlf. City Attorney. David Sellergren. the City's RDF Consultant Mr. Klovning. and himself had met to review the draft burning permit. He further explained that the document is very technical and difficult to understand and that the City's Consultant played a very significant role in analyzing and interpreting the permit. Mr. Klaers stated that in their discussions they found it difficult to separate where their concerns should be addressed; in the UPA Burning permit or the conditional 'use permit. He further stated that Councilmember Schuldt was unable to attend tonight's meeting but have submitted his concerns in a memo to the Mayor and City Council dated September 5. 1986. which is attached to his memo in the Council packets. e He further explained that the attached memorandum from Mr. Sellergren dated September 5, 1986. is a summary of the recommendations regarding comments on the draft UPA Burning Permit and is directed to the Council for their consideration and comments.