Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PAGE 3 <br /> <br />City Council Minutes <br />July 14, 1986 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Mark Harden, resident on Baldwin Avenue, expressed his concerns <br />regarding safety. the condition of Baldwin Avenue. and how the additional <br />traffic which would be generated by the proposed development would affect <br />street deterioration and traffic congestion. <br /> <br />Vice-Chairman Wilson closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />Commissioner Fuchs asked the Building and Zoning Administrator if the <br />proposed density was within the limits of the City's Zoning Ordinance. <br />Mr. Rohlf explained that given the size of the property. 2.297 acres, 50 <br />1/2 units would be allowed and the developer is proposing 54 units. <br /> <br />Commissioner <br />flow between <br />property. <br /> <br />Fuchs <br />Ron's <br /> <br />suggested the possibility of cutting off the traffic <br />Foods and Main Street through the Liquor Store <br /> <br />Further discussion of <br />Highway #169 followed. <br />that at this time, it <br />since the intersection <br />11169. <br /> <br />the traffic stacking potential at 5th Street and <br />The City's Engineer, Mr. Terry Maurer, indicated <br />was his opinion that this would not be a problem, <br />only allows a right turn northbound onto Highway <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Discussion was carried on regarding sewer to the property. Mr. Anda <br />indicated that it has not yet been determined which way the sewer hookup <br />would run; either north to 5th Street or east through the neighboring <br />property, by which an easement would be necessary from the owner. <br /> <br />Commissioner Temple asked if it was possible to reduce the density with <br />this plan to meet the City's requirements. Mr. Anda explained that the <br />financing has been set up using the 54 units. He further indicated that <br />the reason they had ended up with more units than allowed was due to a <br />prior survey which showed they had more acreage than the more recent <br />survey did. <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER FUCHS MOVED TO TABLE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR <br />THE ANnA CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATIVE SUBDIVISION AND SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR <br />THE 54 APARTMENT UNITS UNTIr: A NEW DRAWING COULD BE SUBMITTED SHOWING THE <br />FOLLOWING: <br /> <br />1. EXACTLY WHERE THE DRIVEWAY ONTO 5TH STREET WOULD BE LOCATED, DISTANCE <br />FROM THE INTERSECTION OF 5TH AND HIGHWAY #169; <br /> <br />2. WHERE THE SEWER CONNECTION WOULD BE MADE; <br /> <br />, . 'mE EXACT NUMBER OF UNITS PROPOSED AND CORRECT ACREAGE OF THE <br />PROPERTY; <br /> <br />4. THE SETBACK FROM THE CENTERLINE OF HIGHWAY #169. <br /> <br />OOMMISSIONlR TEMPLE SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION PASSED 5-0. <br /> <br />e <br />