My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-09-1986 CC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Minutes
>
City Council 1974 - Present
>
1980-1989
>
1986
>
06-09-1986 CC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:34:44 AM
Creation date
4/12/2005 3:08:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
CCM
date
6/9/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Page 7 <br /> <br />City Council Minutes <br />June 9. 1986 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Discussion was carried on regarding the possibility <br />seeking special legislation to raise the levy limit. <br />request through the City's legislative representative. <br /> <br />of <br />by <br /> <br />Also discussion was carried on regarding <br />balance. Mr. Groen estimated that it should <br />$400.000 to $450.000. At the end of 1985. <br />fund balance is approximately $267.000 <br />approximately $100.000 in superfunds <br />landfill taxes. It was the consensus <br />that a notation be made under the <br />that the $100.000 superfund was included in <br /> <br />the City's fund <br />be approximately <br />he stated. the <br />which includes <br />from accumulated <br />of the City Council <br />fund balance. explaining <br />the total. <br /> <br />The following <br />audit: <br /> <br />comments <br /> <br />were <br /> <br />offered <br /> <br />in <br /> <br />rev iew <br /> <br />of <br /> <br />the <br /> <br />1985 <br /> <br />In the future. <br />Municipal Building <br />departments. <br /> <br />all utility expenditures <br />rather than shown <br /> <br />will <br />under <br /> <br />be under <br />individual <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />On page 24. the unfavorable <br />expenditures flowing through <br />budget. which had not been <br />time of the audit. Also. <br />funds went throught this department. <br /> <br />balance was due <br />the Street <br />completely recovered <br />the street light <br /> <br />to Lawcon <br />Department <br />at the <br />refunding <br /> <br />Mr. Groen suggested that at <br />Council should take a look at <br />retire the debts in the debt service <br /> <br />budget time. <br />implementing a <br />fund (page 28). <br /> <br />the <br />program <br /> <br />City <br />to <br /> <br />Lori Johnson indicated that she has been unsuccessful in <br />obtaining cost documentation from Wright County in order <br />to request payment from the state of Minnesota for costs <br />in relation to the CSAH #42 bridge. She further <br />indicated that she has recently spoke with Dave Reed on <br />MN/Dot and obtained the name of an alternate person to <br />contact at Wright County who would be more helpful. <br /> <br />All incoming MSA funds will <br />account and dispersed to <br />This way. the City Council <br />MSA Discretionary funds <br />MSA projects over costs) at <br /> <br />now be channeled <br />specific funds <br />will know the <br />(excess funds <br />all times. <br /> <br />through one <br />when needed. <br />balance of the <br />from individual <br /> <br /> City staff was asked to further investigate the entry <br /> for Highway 1110 Street light work. Dave Reed of MN/Dot <br /> has indicted that the bill was for additional work to <br /> located the el ec t ric al lines underground. and that the <br /> work was ordered by the Municipal Utilities. The City <br /> Council felt that the res pons ibli ty for payment of the <br />e costs lies with the Municipal Utilities. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.