Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Page 5 <br /> <br />City Council Minutes <br />June 9, 1986 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Acting Mayor Schuldt indicated that the reason <br />to appear before the Council was to determine <br />the bill for $935 was reasonable for the amount <br />and to determine who was responsible for payment. <br /> <br />he was <br />whether or <br />of work <br /> <br />asked <br />not <br />done, <br /> <br />Discussion <br />Deschenes <br />contractor <br />the extent <br />property. <br /> <br />was <br />property <br />for the <br />of work <br /> <br />carried on <br />was left <br />Barrington <br />done by <br /> <br />regarding the <br />in by Mr. <br />Place drainage <br />Mr. Deschenes <br /> <br />condition Mr. <br />Howard Blomker, <br />work, and also <br />in restoring his <br /> <br />Acting Mayor Schuldt and Councilmember Gunkel questioned Mr. <br />Deschenes as to why he had waited so long to present the bill <br />to the City. Mr. Deschenes stated that he had orginally <br />given the bill to Mr. Santwire and that Mr. Santwire had told <br />him he gave the bill to the City. Upon contacting Mr. <br />Santwire several times since, Mr. Santwire stated that he did <br />not know what had become of the bill and that the City must" <br />have misplaced or misfiled it. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Acting Mayor <br />payment laid <br />the one that <br />the damage to <br />with acting <br />developer's <br />Santwire was <br />project, the <br />very slim. <br /> <br />schuldt stated he felt <br />with the developer, Mr. <br />obtained the easement <br />Mr. 'Deschenes property. <br />Mayor Schuldt, but stated <br />financial condition and <br />no longer involved in <br />chances that Mr. Santwire <br /> <br />the responsibility for <br />Santwire, since he was <br />and was responsible for <br />Mr. Deschenes agreed <br />that due to the <br />the fact that Mr. <br />the Barrington Place <br />would pay the bill was <br /> <br />Mr. Deschenes <br />to grant an <br />opportunity to <br /> <br />stated that when <br />easement for the <br />finally recover his <br /> <br />he was approached by <br />cul-de-sac, he saw <br />expenses. <br /> <br />the <br />it as <br /> <br />City <br />an <br /> <br />Councilmember Engstrom stated that <br />obtain the easement since it is <br />blacktopped, but felt that the proper <br />bill Mr. Deschenes was presenting. <br /> <br />the Ci ty <br />already <br />people <br /> <br />would like <br />in place <br />should pay <br /> <br />to <br />and <br />the <br /> <br />Discussion was carried on regarding <br />system in the area came to be. <br /> <br />how <br /> <br />the <br /> <br />existing <br /> <br />drainage <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />City Administrator Pat <br />not he had been <br />property clearly <br />Deschenes stated that <br />further questioned Mr. <br />donate the easement if <br />stated that he stood <br />sac in exchange for <br />invoice. <br /> <br />Klaers asked Mr. Deschenes whether or <br />assessed for the cul-de-sac, since his <br />benefits from the improvement. Mr. <br />he had not been assessed. Mr. Klaers <br />Deschenes if he would be willing to <br />the City paid the bill. Mr. Deschenes <br />firm in his offer to grant the cul-de- <br />$300.00 cash and payment of the $935.00 <br />