Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Page 8 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />City Council Minutes <br />May 19. 1986 <br /> <br />Terry Tempesta indicated he would like a six foot chain link fence. <br /> <br />The Mahudkas were not present at the meeting but had indicated to Mr. <br />Raudio that woven fence would work for them. <br /> <br />Mary Jo Miske noted she does not want to be responsible for putting up the <br />fence. Frank Miske noted he wanted to be sure the fence had a top rail. <br /> <br />Art Raudio read a letter he handed to the Mayor and Council members. <br /> <br />The letter of credit was discussed at this time. It was the consensus of <br />the City Council that the letter of credit need not include blacktopping <br />of the roads. <br /> <br />Mr. Frank Miske stated he had several <br />surfacing should be done before the 30 <br />the number of campsites should be <br />Council was bending all the rules <br />City. <br /> <br />which included the following: Hard <br />campsites are allowed to be opened; <br />equal in all phases; he felt City <br />to allow the campground in the <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />The dollar amount of the letter of credit was discussed. It was agreed <br />that the letter of credit include the following: $60.000 for fencing and <br />$50.000 for grading and seeding. It was noted that the letter of credit <br />would be for phase I and when phase I was completed the letter of credit <br />would be released. It was further decided that at the beginning of Phase <br />II. the developers would go before the City Council and it would be <br />determined at that time whether another letter of credit would be <br />necessary for this phase. <br /> <br />Mr. Bob Johnson. Attorney for the Developer. indicated to the City Council <br />that there were Some items in the conditional use permit he would like <br />to discuss. He noted that he would like some wording added to item #6 <br />which would state that the registration records be available to the City <br />Staff for inspection to control the maximum amount of stay. <br /> <br />Mr. Johnson noted he is requesting that in #17. the number 40 which refers <br />to the number of rental units allowed. be deleted. He indicated he would <br />rather see a percentage figure. He noted that he felt that he would like <br />to see the language changed in #17 regarding the size of the rental units <br />by deleting the length and width numbers and state "portable" instead of <br />the numbers. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />The number of rental units was discussed. Mr. Johnson indicated the <br />developers were requesting at least 50% rental units. The Council <br />discussed the fact that at the Planning Commission meeting the developers <br />were requesting only 30 rental units total. and now have raised it to 50%. <br />This 50% would be 360 units out of the total proposed 720 units in all <br />three phases. Councilmember Gunkel indicated that she felt 25% rental <br />units would be a good starting point. Mr. Norm Holme indicated he did not <br />want to put a limitation on the business by not being allowed to rent <br />units. He indicated that when a person drives by. and looks at the <br />campground. he would not be able to tell if the units are rental units or <br />privately owned. <br />