Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Page 7 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />City Council Minutes <br />May S. 1986 <br /> <br />Item 18 - At this time Mr. Raudio handed out information regarding rental <br />type units. Discussion was held regarding these units at which <br />the consensus was that this could easily turn into something of <br />a mobile home type park. It was indicated by Councilmember <br />Williams that perhaps the campground be allowed a certain <br />number of units and that these units be of a camper type <br />structure on wheels and readily moveable. not to exceed a <br />certain number of feet in size. <br /> <br />It was the consensus of the City Council that the City Attorney <br />draw up new wording for this item and present it to the <br />Counc il. <br /> <br />Item <br /> <br />19 <br /> <br />It was <br />signs and <br /> <br />the consensus of the City Council that all internal <br />directional signs be at the dscretion of the owner. <br /> <br />Item 27 Delete hazardous or dangerous situations and add "hazardous. <br />dangerous or environmentally unacceptable." <br /> <br />Also delete "by young children." <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Discussion was held regarding the letter of credit. what it <br />should include and the dollar amount. It was the consensus of <br />the City Council that the letter of credit shall cover the hard <br />surfacing of the roads and parking lots per phase. the entire <br />fencing. and also to cover any environmentally unacceptable <br />situation. and further to direct the City Engineer to come up <br />with a dollar amount for the letter of credit. <br /> <br />Mr. Raudio questioned why a letter of credit was necessary for <br />the grading when it is necessary for the grading to be done <br />before anything else can proceed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Gunkel suggested getting the necessary figures <br />and looking at the whole concept before actually making a <br />decision on the letter of credit. It was the consensus of the <br />City Council to agree with Councilmember Gunkel. <br /> <br />The Building and Zoning Administrator indicated that he had some concerns <br />regarding the conditional use permit. <br /> <br />The County would like easements to be 100 feet which would require an <br />additional 17 foot of easement granted on County Road 12 and County <br />Road 40. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />2. More detail for the phases. He questioned whether the plan <br />presented by Mr. Raudio was detailed enough and questioned whether <br />the Council would like to see details for the 2nd and 3rd phase. The <br />Council indicated they would like to see these details at concept <br />approval. <br />