My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.1 PCSR 08-23-1994
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
_Prior to 1999
>
1994
>
08-23-1994
>
5.1 PCSR 08-23-1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2018 4:11:26 PM
Creation date
4/2/2018 4:11:22 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• well replacement program, which shall come in force at such time the well monitoring <br /> reveals increased contamination of any private or public water source. <br /> ISSUE 6: MINING DIRECTION. It is the position of the Task Force that mining <br /> operations begin at the Northern portion of the property and proceed in increments in a <br /> Southerly direction. <br /> ISSUE 7: RECLAMATION AND SLOPES. It is the position of the Task Force that <br /> reclamation will begin in areas where mining has been completed as soon as possible <br /> Concerning slopes, the Task Force assumes that slopes will be graded to a 4-1 ratio. The <br /> Task Force assumes that all top soil will be stockpiled during the active mining phase, <br /> returned to the reclaimed areas to an average depth of no less than three inches, with <br /> native grasses and trees planted to retain the soil. In summary, reclamation will be an <br /> ongoing process. <br /> ISSUE 8: NOISE CONTROL: it is the position of the Task Force that Shiely will <br /> conform to state and local noise level restrictions at all times. Furthermore, it is our <br /> understanding that no explosives will be used at any time in the Elk River operation. <br /> ISSUE 9: BERMS AND FENCING. It is our understanding that Shiely will not make <br /> extensive use of berms except along a segment of County 33. This is acceptable to the <br /> Task Force. It is our further understanding that Shiely needs to control access to much of <br /> • its property for security and safety reasons. At the same time, area residents would like to <br /> continue their traditional access to the property as much as possible for recreation and <br /> nature study. It is the position of the Task Force that Shiely separate its active mining <br /> area from non-active areas with a mesh fencing similar to that used to control access along <br /> highways. If mining operations proceed sourthward, this arrangement would allow area <br /> residents continued access to existing trails for a number of years, while at the same time <br /> securing areas where active mining operations are underway. <br /> The Task Force finds any use of barb wire to be unacceptable. Furthermore, the fence <br /> should be not more than 4' in height so as to minimize restrictions in wildlife mobility. <br /> The Task Force is most interested in having a small delegation meet with the Shiely <br /> Company in the near future for the purpose of clarifying and resolving the enclosed issues. <br /> In addition, the Task Force wishes to discuss the creation of an ongoing Advisory Group. <br /> Please contact John Kuester at 441/4327 or Sarah Sawyer at 441/5642 to schedule this <br /> meeting. We look forward to hearing from you soon. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Charles Blood Mike Niziolek Sarah Sawyer <br /> Mary Blood Noel Paukert Scott Stevenson <br /> John Kuester Bruce Pearson Vickie Stevenson <br /> • Greg Larson Paul Peterson <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.