My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3.1 PCSR 06-21-1994
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
_Prior to 1999
>
1994
>
06-21-1994
>
3.1 PCSR 06-21-1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2018 3:11:57 PM
Creation date
4/2/2018 3:11:51 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. John Weicht <br /> -3- <br /> May 11, 1994 <br /> • In order to analyze the traffic implications of the proposed <br /> of existing turn movement volumes at the Main St./Carson St. intersection <br /> needed. To facilitate this understanding, p p°S� auto mall, an understanding <br /> II the me g, turn movement counts wereperformed s <br /> period (4-6 p.m.) in fifteen minute intervals on M 4, 194 during <br /> Eenshoo & Associates, Inc. Existing total approach volumes were also <br /> Maier Stewart & Associates, Inc. for the T.H. 169/Main St. intersection. ' <br /> obtained from <br /> A i n r tM 'n <br /> In <br /> A listing of accidents which have occurred at the <br /> Main St./Carson St. intersection was <br /> obtained from the Elk River Police Department. This listing showed that over the past <br /> four and one half years, 15 accidents had been reported at this intersection for <br /> average of three and one third accidents per year. It was further learned from the <br /> of Police that one type of accident had occurred of Police <br /> This type more frequently than others at the <br /> Chief <br /> of accident involved eastbound vehicles on Main St. that were <br /> turning left onto northbound Carson St. hitting vehicles on Carson St. waiting <br /> onto Main St. to turn <br /> RQ way.AlternativP <br /> Two different roadway alternatives were considered in the traffic analysis. <br /> involved having the only access to Carson St. at Main St., as is current) h <br /> other alternative involved the creation of a right turn in/out access y The first <br /> north end of Carson St., in addition to the Main St. access. on T.H. 169 at the <br /> Y the case. The <br /> TRAFFIC FORECASTS <br /> • Tri n r liQn <br /> Trip generation rates were established for theyroposed development to account <br /> expected new and pass by trips. Tripion for the <br /> based on studies done at similar locaons by Ben hoof&rates r Associates, Inc.,the auto uses e the <br /> trip generation rates for the other retail uses were based on information obtained <br /> representatives of those uses. We are confident that the ' Ic. while the <br /> Mr. Movies and the Little Caesar's Pizza uses are conservativelyvhigh. ratfor them <br /> ugh. <br /> Next, it is important to classify trips to and from the development in terms o <br /> f the <br /> following two categories: <br /> . New trips - These are trips that either would be new trips solely tofrom the <br /> development. and <br /> • . Passby trips - These are existing "through" trips on T.H. 169 that in the future <br /> would include a stop at the proposed development. <br /> Based on our experiences and information published by the Institute of Tr <br /> Engineers, we would estimate that approximate) 90 <br /> the development would be new, while 10 percentould Transportation <br /> Ypercent of the trips generated by <br /> account for multipurpose trips, or trips that wouldmakesstbops at�more thanfied ass one of the <br /> businesses in the development, a five percent reduction factor was applied to <br /> trip generation. the overall <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.