Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES <br />FEBRUARY 18, 1986 <br /> <br />PAGE 6 <br /> <br />It was the consensus of the City ouncil that the campground idea was a <br />good concept. <br /> <br />12. Resolution <br />on Sanirar <br /> <br />Receiving Feasibilit <br />Sewer 1m rovements on <br /> <br />The City Administrator indicated t <br />bring back the School Street Proj <br />Kuhn along with Mayor Hinkle and Co <br />had requested a building permit for <br />the staff had denied his request <br />recommendation stating the line <br />Administrator indicated that as 0 <br />staff to issue a permit to Creative <br />the improvement project. Mr. Ku <br />timetable doesn't permit the conting <br /> <br />Discussion of the <br />Estates should be <br />project. <br /> <br />project was <br />allowed the <br /> <br /> <br />and Callin <br />Street <br /> <br />for Public Hearin <br /> <br />at the Council had requested staff to <br />ct. He indicated he had met with Ron <br />ncilmember Gunkel. He noted Ron Kuhn <br />a 24 unit apartment building and that <br />because of the Sewer Superintendent's <br />ould not hold 24 unis. The City <br />that time the Council authorized the <br />Estates contingent on the ordering of <br />had indicated that Creative Estate's <br />ncy. <br /> <br />h ld regarding whether or not Creative <br />o tion of not being included in the <br /> <br />Councilmember Gunkel indicated she felt the Council has a responsibility <br />to do the best job possible feels it would be a mistake to leave <br />property out of the project and r commends leaving the Creative Estates <br />property in the project so that the is done correctly. <br /> <br />Mayor Hinkle indicated he agreed <br />Creative Estates should be included <br /> <br />Mayor Hinkle indicated that Creative <br />assessments they had previously paid <br />option in which the total cost of th <br />he can receive a building permit. <br />is the only project along the whol <br />and is being denied the opportunity <br /> <br /> <br />Councilmember Gunkel in that <br />project. <br /> <br />Estates was receiving some credit for <br />Ron Kuhn indicated he agreed to the <br />assessment would be $71,600 provided <br />He indicated his complaint is that he <br />area that has paid assessments twice <br />o hook up to the sewer. <br /> <br />Mayor Hinkle indicated he would like the public hearing ordered. <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER GUNKEL MOVED TO AD <br />RECEIVING FEASIBILITY STUDY AND <br />SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ON SCHOOL S <br />COUNCILMEMBER ENGSTROM SECONDED THE <br /> <br />PT RESOLUTION 86-9, A RESOLUTION <br />ALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON SANITARY <br />ET (IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1986-1). <br />OTION. THE MOTION PASSED 4-0. <br /> <br /> <br />/0 <br />13. COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT MOVED TO OPT RESOLUTION 86-9. A RESOLUTION <br />DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED <br />ASSESSMENT FOR SANITARY SEWER IMPR: VEMENTS ON SCHOOL STREET (IMPROVEMENT <br />PROJECT NO. 1986-1) . COUNCIL ER ENGSTROM SECONDED THE MOTION. THE <br />MOTION PASSED 4-0. <br />