My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12 PCSR 12-28-1993
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
_Prior to 1999
>
1993
>
12-28-1993
>
12 PCSR 12-28-1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2018 12:55:20 PM
Creation date
4/2/2018 12:55:17 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4111 <br /> __ <br /> Zoning barriers • <br /> Building suburban walls against the poor <br /> If recent events in Maple Grove demon- place on the outer metropolitan fringe <br /> strated how suburban mean-spirited- where young families and others of <br /> ness can frustrate efforts to create af- modest means could build or buy a <br /> fordable housing, then Lakeville is home at an affordable price. Such hous- <br /> showing how the same result can flow ing still dominates the city's supply. <br /> from, more innocent intentions. The <br /> purpose of Lakeville's new zoning ordi- The problem is that Lakeville seems to <br /> nance may not be to increase housing be following the pattern of other sub- <br /> costs and force low- and moderate-in- urbs by adopting policies that would <br /> come people to look elsewhere, but make it too expensive a place to live for <br /> that's the likely effect. the children of those who initially set- <br /> , tled. Some may do what their parents <br /> In changing its zoning ordinance to did—move further out. Others may be <br /> slow down growth, Lakeville can argue left with no choice but to add them- <br /> that it is only doing what hundreds of selves to the growing concentration of <br /> other developing suburbs here and else- lower-income people in the central cit- <br /> where have done for decades in the ies and older,inner-ring suburbs. <br /> name of sound fiscal and environmen- <br /> • tal policy. Whether Lakeville now has an adequate <br /> supply of low-income housing is in dis- <br /> Actually, by moving to preserve 700 to pute. City officials say yes; Rep. Myron <br /> 800 acres of wetland, Lakeville is taking Orfield says no. Orfield is the Minne- <br /> extraordinary steps to protect a valuable apolis DFLer whose bill in the 1993 <br /> natural resource, something that previ- Legislature would have required sub- <br /> ously developed suburbs all too often urbs to reduce their zoning and other <br /> failed to do. And for that the city should barriers to low-income housing. <br /> be commended, not blamed. <br /> Whatever the case today, Lakeville's <br /> But increasing the lot size for single- zoning changes and the housing-cost <br /> family homes from 11,000 to 15,000 increases that will result illustrate the <br /> square feet, plus requiring that all new problem that Orfield's bill was trying to <br /> homes have room to accommodate a address — the tendency of prosperous <br /> three-car garage, deck and porch, will and fast-growing suburbs to wall out the <br /> inevitably increase the cost of buying a poor and near poor. <br /> house in Lakeville to a level beyond the <br /> reach of many Twin Citians. In the end it makes no difference <br /> whether the wall was built intentionally <br /> Like most suburbs, the once semi-rural or inadvertently. The damage to the <br /> Lakeville began its urbanization as a region's social and economic health is <br /> moderate-income community — a the same either way. <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.