Laserfiche WebLink
• y <br /> Stephen Rohlf <br /> - Page 2 <br /> • <br /> revegetation of disturbed areas should include the plantingof native trees, woodyshrubs, and <br /> g <br /> grasses where possible. <br /> Wetland impacts associated with this project must be fully addressed for both the wetland in <br /> question and water management purposes. The information provided indicates further <br /> development is expected in this watershed and the project may require mitigation under the <br /> Wetlands Conservation Act. The EAW should address these issues as well as those mentioned <br /> above. We recommend that decision on the need for further environmental review be postponed <br /> for 30 days as provided by Minnesota Rules 4410.1700, subpart 2a(B), to collect the necessary <br /> information. It may also be possible to provide the needed information during the record of <br /> decision process in your responses to comments made on this EAW. No matter which outcome <br /> unfolds, we request the opportunity to review any future information gathered in this regard. <br /> Thank you for the opportunity to review this document. We look forward to receiving your record <br /> of decision and responses to our comments. Minnesota Rules part 4410.1700, subparts 4 & 5, <br /> requires you to send us your Record Of Decision within five days of deciding this action. Please <br /> contact Don Buckhout of my staff, at (612) 296-8212, if you have any questions regarding this <br /> letter. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> • Thomas W. Balcom, Supervisor <br /> Natural Resources Planning and Review Section <br /> Office of Planning <br /> c: Bob Hance <br /> Steve Colvin <br /> Tom Lutgen <br /> Bonita Eliason <br /> Lynn M. Lewis, USFWS <br /> Gregg Downing, EQB <br /> Scott Erickson, Nu-Western Development Company <br /> #930146-01 <br /> ER7.ELKPARK.DOC <br /> 410 <br />