Laserfiche WebLink
License & CUP Renewal, ConTeck Page 2 <br /> April 21, 1993 <br /> • and equipment being used to treat soil than was originally <br /> approved. <br /> Referencing the conditional use permit, the following <br /> paragraphs will highlight staff ' s recommended changes to that <br /> document: <br /> Section 1 - Scope And Conduct of Operation <br /> a. The updated MPCA air emissions permit number has been <br /> added to this section. <br /> b. Staff is proposing language that more specifically <br /> spells out that the operation is for the treatment of <br /> petroleum contaminated soil only. <br /> c . The last proposed change to this section is to allow <br /> for a staff review and consequently, approval or veto <br /> of an alternative treatment facility at this site <br /> based on the alternative facilities ' ability to meet <br /> the emissions standards set forth in this permit and <br /> MPCA' s air emissions permit. Staff also allowed for <br /> Mr. Kreger to have an appeal process with the <br /> Council, if he does not agree with staff ' s review of <br /> an alternative facility. <br /> • Section 2 - Specific Requirements <br /> ( 01) Conditions Precedent - In this section, staff removed <br /> the condition that the permit was subject to approval <br /> of a contingency action plan for the landfill . A <br /> contingency action plan has been approved and this <br /> condition is no longer needed. <br /> ( 02 ) Soil Storage - During the original review in 1990, <br /> Mr. Kreger indicated the stock piles of soil waiting <br /> for treatment would be covered with dirt to avoid the <br /> petroleum products from being volatized (vaporized <br /> and released to the atmosphere) . As far as staff <br /> knows, this has not been done. Another concern with <br /> the stock piles is fugitive dust. Because of these <br /> issues, staff is proposing the maximum storage <br /> allowed be 20, 000 cubic yards . <br /> (06 ) Testing Schedule For Residues - Staff is proposing to <br /> revise this language to take into consideration the <br /> fact that an alternative facility may not be equipped <br /> with the same pollution control equipment as the <br /> original facility. The new language proposed by <br /> staff would allow for testing of residue from <br /> 411 whatever equipment is used on an alternative facility. <br />