My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7 PCSR 02-23-1993
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
_Prior to 1999
>
1993
>
02-23-1993
>
7 PCSR 02-23-1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2018 9:25:09 AM
Creation date
4/2/2018 9:25:08 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Minutes Page 9 <br /> June 23, 1992 <br /> Vice Chair Eberley stated that she would also like to see the ordinance <br /> changed to accommodate these types of uses rather than using the PUD <br /> mechanism. <br /> Commissioner Spotts stated that the City ordinance addresses the zero <br /> line situation for residential townhouses and duplexes and questioned <br /> whether the ordinance could be changed to include commercial zero line <br /> situations. <br /> Peter Beck, City Attorney, stated that the City would need a separate <br /> ordinance to address the issues of zero lot line development in <br /> commercial situations. <br /> COMMISSIONER SPOTTS MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF <br /> THE ZONE CHANGE REQUEST BY DENNIS CHUBA FROM C-2/OFFICE DISTRICT TO <br /> PUD/PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CITING STAFF'S MEMO DATED 6/3/92 REGARDING <br /> THE FINDINGS OF FACTS. COMMISSIONER MINTON SECONDED THE MOTION. <br /> COMMISSIONER SPOTTS AMENDED THE MOTION TO INCLUDE A RECOMMENDATION TO <br /> THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THEY REVIEW THE ORDINANCE TO ADDRESS THE ISSUES <br /> OF ZERO LOT LINE DEVELOPMENT IN COMMERCIAL SITUATIONS. COMMISSIONER <br /> MINTON SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 4-0. <br /> 11. Consider Conditional Use Permit Request (Office Complex) by Dennis <br /> Chuba/P.H. <br /> • Steve Rohlf, Building & Zoning Administrator, stated that along with <br /> the conditional use permit request, an administrative subdivision to <br /> create three parcels is needed contingent upon the zone change and CUP <br /> being approved. <br /> Janelle Szklarski, Zoning Assistant, stated that she had received a <br /> call from Glenn Sundeen, Elk River Utilities Electrical Department <br /> stating his concern with the potential size of the green ash trees that <br /> the applicant was planning on planting that they are very fast growing <br /> trees which could interfere with the utility's overhead wires. Mr. <br /> Sundeen would like to see the applicant substitute some other type of <br /> trees, perhaps slower growing. Ms. Szklarski stated that she had <br /> talked with Gary Schmitz, Recycling Coordinator, and he had given her a <br /> list of slower growing and shorter trees that might meet this criteria. <br /> Vice Chair Eberley opened the public hearing. <br /> Donald Driessen, 324 Main Street, questioned whether the applicant had <br /> a building permit for this project. Mr. Rohlf stated that the <br /> applicant can be issued a building permit because office buildings <br /> under the current C-2 zoning are a permitted use, although the <br /> developer is at his own risk until the City Council allows the <br /> developer to build with a zero lot line. <br /> ( • Stewart Wilson, 18975 Troy Street, asked if you zone change to a PUD, <br /> does the developer have to enter into a PUD agreement with the City. <br /> Mr. Rohlf addressed his question, by stating that typically there is a <br /> PUD agreement, but staff is recommending that the conditions of the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.