My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7 PCSR 02-23-1993
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
_Prior to 1999
>
1993
>
02-23-1993
>
7 PCSR 02-23-1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2018 9:25:09 AM
Creation date
4/2/2018 9:25:08 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-(./ <br /> \� ITEM 7 <br /> ligTO: PLANNING COMMISSION �1Y <br /> lkRiver FROM: JANELLE SCHMITZ 7—ej <br /> DATE: FEBRUARY 12, 1993 <br /> SUBJECT: ORDINANCE AMENDMENT SECTION <br /> 900.20 "GENERAL REGULATIONS" (ZERO <br /> LOT LINE) /PUBLIC HEARING <br /> The City is initiating an ordinance amendment to Section 900 . 20 <br /> which would allow zero lot line developments in the C2 and C3 <br /> zoning districts . This issue was discussed with the Planning <br /> Commission and City Council when Dennis Chuba applied for a <br /> zone change to PUD to construct a zero lot line office building <br /> at the corner of Evans and Main. The current ordinance <br /> addresses zero lot line situations in residential districts to <br /> accommodate townhouses and duplexes, however, commercial zero <br /> lot line developments are not addressed. The exception is the <br /> Cl zoning district where no setbacks are required. I am <br /> enclosing a copy of the June 23, 1992, Planning Commission <br /> minutes in which the commission discussed this issue. <br /> Staff feels this ordinance amendment is needed to provide <br /> • developers with some flexibility in the development of <br /> commercial property. As in the residential zero lot line <br /> requirements, all other setbacks in a commercial district <br /> should be met. The zero lot line would only apply to the side <br /> yard setbacks along common wall lines . In addition, the <br /> property would have to be platted to accommodate the zero lot <br /> line situation as in the case of the Chuba development. Staff <br /> does not feel zero lot line commercial developments would be <br /> receiving special treatment because all other standards of the <br /> zoning district would apply. <br /> I am attaching a copy of a draft ordinance amendment which <br /> would allow zero lot line development in both the C2 and C3 <br /> zoning districts . Staff is recommending approval of the <br /> attached ordinance. <br /> • <br /> 720 Dodge Avenue N.W., Elk River, Minnesota 55330 (612) 441-7420 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.