My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-22-1987 CC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Minutes
>
City Council 1974 - Present
>
1980-1989
>
1987
>
06-22-1987 CC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:34:42 AM
Creation date
4/4/2005 3:50:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
CCM
date
6/22/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Page 3 <br /> <br />City Council Minutes <br />June 22. 1987 <br /> <br />e The City debt limit is currently at a little over $3.000.000. The City <br />has approximately $1.000.000 falling under the debt limit. <br /> <br />Hobbit Hills Subdivision was again discussed and it was suggested to look <br />at refinancing a bond to reduce the assessments which are causing a <br />deficit balance in the bond fund. The city can cancel the current <br />assessment and have the property reassessed. but how is this made <br />equitable when some properties are paid and some are not? A question was <br />also raised regarding whether or not reassessment would prevent tax <br />forfeiture. <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER TRALLE MOVED THAT A $375.000 IMPROVEMENT BOND BE <br />INVESTIGATED BY A BOND CONSULTANT TO SEE WHAT IS THE BEST ACTION TO BE <br />TAKEN. COUNCILMEMBER HOLMGREN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 4- <br />O. <br /> <br />There is $228.000 in the Sewer Fund which pays for repairs and <br />maintenance. Mr. Groen stated that he feels that as the size of the plant <br />continues to grow and age. so should the amount of cash on reserve. <br /> <br />Groen pointed out a dramatic improvement from 1985 to 1986 in the water <br />utilities operation. In 1985. profit was $19.537. and in 1986 it grew to <br />$72.821. <br /> <br />The question was asked. "Would it be to the City's advantage to have the <br />e Utilities audit done by the same firm as the City?" <br /> <br />Councilmember Tralle questioned the cost of the audit and why the <br />Utilities audit was so much more than the City's audit. <br /> <br />The Utilities is established under State Statutes. It is a split entity <br />but it ultimately reports to the Council. <br /> <br />Municipal liquor stores were briefly discussed and it was stated that they <br />can sometimes be detrimental to cities because of such things as <br />management. on/off sales and insurance. Municipal liquor stores need <br />sales volume and Elk River has both the volume as well as the location. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmgren questioned how a person running a profit liquor <br />operation is rewarded as manager for a good year. Klaers addressed this <br />question by stating that department heads are hired to do a good job. <br />Councilmember Schuldt suggested looking at the improvements in the liquor <br />store facility as a "reward" the same way the City views the equipment of <br />other departments. <br /> <br />Pat Klaers stated that some transferring of funds needed to be done and <br />the following motions were made: <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />cOUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT MOVED TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 87-29 AUTHORING TRANSFER <br />OF FUNDS FROM THE SEWAGE DISPOSAL FUND TO THE SEWAGE DISPOSAL CAPITAL <br />RESERVE FUND. COUNCILMEMBER DOBEL SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION <br />CARRIED 5-0. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.