Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Page 2 <br /> <br />Joint Meeting Minutes <br />April 11. 1988 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Another issue the Administrator discussed was future land use. both east and <br />north. from the Gates Avenue and Main Street intersection. The future Land <br />Use Map calls for commercial activity in this area and discussion at the March <br />28. 1988. meeting suggested possible high density residential activities. It <br />was the consensus of the group that this area should remain designated for <br />commercial activities on the Land Use Map. Additionally. there was concern <br />indicated over the amount of high density residential land available in the <br />community and the location for such land use activities. It was suggested <br />that multi-family dwelling units should become a conditional use in commercial <br />zones rath~r than a permitted use. <br /> <br />The final issue discussed at the March 28. 1988. that was reviewed by the City <br />Administrator. re1Lted to neighborhood convenience stores. The Administrator <br />indicated the Staff recommendation against such convenience stores. However. <br />it was the consensus of the group to provide for such land uses in the text of <br />the GMP. but that no specific locations on the Land Use Map should be <br />designated for such activities. It was the general consensus of the group <br />that as the City grows and the need for such convenience stores is <br />demonstrated that appropriate action can be taken by the City Council to <br />provide an opportunity for this type of land use. <br /> <br />Mayor Gunkel indicated the remaining elements of the Growth Management Plan <br />that needs to be reviewed at this meeting include the industrial. parks. <br />transporation. and implementation sections of the GMP. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Bob Wuornos. Planning Consultant. reviewed the industrial section of the GMP. <br />It was noted within the policies under goal #1. that a distinction needs to be <br />made between industrial land that has municipal utilities available and <br />industrial land that does not have such municipal utilities available. It was <br />noted that figure 6A. existing industrial zoning map. had some omissions for <br />the solid waste facility overlay zone at the UPA site and RDF site. It was <br />noted that the property around the County Government Center is listed as <br />excellent for industrial use. and yet it is also listed as a high ranking site <br />for commercial activities. <br /> <br />The future land use map calls for a mix of industrial. commercial and high <br />density residential along Highway 10. with low density residential off of the <br />Highway. The best industrial sites without municipal utilities is along <br />Highway 10 in the southeast part of the community. It was noted that light <br />industrial is planned for the very southeast part of the community along <br />Highway 10. where tbe previous zone for this area was C-3B. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />At this time. the Mayor introduced into the record a letter from Mr. Bob <br />Vandenberg dated March 28. 1988. which indicated his desire to have a mix of <br />industrial and residential land uses designated for his property. Stephen <br />Rohlf. Building and Zoning Administrator. indicated that he has met with Mr. <br />Vandenberg and that through a minor reduction in the industrial zone east of <br />Highway 169 and south of County Road 12 would satisfy the request as listed in <br />the letter. It was the consensus of the group to have the industrial area in <br />the southeast corner of the community; the industrial area along Highway 10. <br />next to 16Sth Avenue; and the industrial area east of Highway 169. south of <br />County Road 12. reduced on the proposed Land Use Map. <br />