Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Page 6 <br /> <br />City Council Minutes <br />April 4. 1988 <br /> <br />there is no reason to reconsider these elements as it will result in <br />delaying the entire project. <br /> <br />The City Administrator indicated that if the four or five commercial <br />properties west of Lowell Avenue were added. it would add to the expense <br />of the project and more than likely would not decrease the assessment <br />amount to the property owners. <br /> <br />Councilmember Tralle indicated that he agreed with the City <br />Administrator and also with Mayor Gunkel in that changing the assessment <br />district would delay the project. <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER DOBEL MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 88-23. A RESOLUTION <br />ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT IN THE MATTER OF THE DOWNTOWN BEAUTIFICATION <br />IMPROVEMENTS OF 1987. COUNCILMEMBER TRALLE SECONDED THE MOTION. <br /> <br />Councilmember Schuldt indicated that he has heard many indirect negative <br />comments from the business people (tenants) regarding the downtown <br />project. He stated he had hoped that the people would have come forward <br />and personally voiced their concerns. but has not heard any first hand <br />objections since the start of the project and noted that because of this <br />he would be voting to order the improvement. <br /> <br />THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br /> <br />OOUNCILMlMBER <br />ADOPTING THE <br />BEAUTIfICATION <br /> <br />TRALLE MOVED '1'0 ADOPT RESOLUTION 88-24. A RESOLUTION <br />FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL IN THE MATTER OF THE DOWNTOWN <br />IMPROVEMENTS. COUNCILMEMBER DOBEL SECONDED THE MOTION. <br /> <br />Councilmember Tralle indicated that to reconsider the method or area of <br />assessments would delay the project and would be too costly at this <br />point. <br /> <br />Councilmember Schuldt stated that street and sewer is based on a front <br />footage basis. He noted that the method of assessment for the <br />beautification items is a different matter as the items being assessed <br />do not run by properties on a front foot basis. He noted that it is <br />difficult to assess this in the same manner as the sewer and street <br />improvements. He noted that because the improvements are of the nature <br />they are. he is in favor of the method of assessment. <br /> <br />THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br /> <br />COUNCILMIMB!R SCHULDT MOVED '1'0 ADOPT RESOLUTION 88-25. A RESOLUTION <br />ACCEPTING BID FROM SPENSOR ELECTRIC AT A PRICE OF $73.243 AND <br />AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF CONTRACT IN THE MATTER OF THE DOWNTOWN STREET <br />LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT OF 1988. COUNCILMEMBER HOLMGREN SECONDED THE <br />MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br />