My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-04-1988 CC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Minutes
>
City Council 1974 - Present
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
04-04-1988 CC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:34:40 AM
Creation date
3/23/2005 2:34:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
CCM
date
4/4/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Page 3 <br /> <br />City Council Minutes <br />April 4, 1988 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Ronald Kuhn <br />Harvey Wohlers <br />Allen Nadeau <br />Joseph Sipe <br />Michael Rafferty <br />Ronald Robeck <br />Robert Dare <br />Hetrick - Amoco <br />R. A. Dorsey <br />Dan Anderson (includes 4 parcels) <br /> <br />Mayor <br />Dale <br />zone. <br /> <br />Gunkel <br />Johnson, <br /> <br />indicated <br />who is <br /> <br />she had also received a notice of appeal from <br />a residential property owner in the commercial <br /> <br />Mr. Dan Anderson, property owner of 4 separate parcels of property, <br />indicated that while he did sign the document objecting to the <br />assessment, he was actually not opposed to the assessment or the <br />project, but was opposed to the fact that the commercial properties west <br />of Lowell were not included in the assessment. He indicated the <br />properties west of Lowell had requested to become part of the commercial <br />area and the Council extended the commercial area to accommodate the <br />request. He indicated that the total commercial area should be given an <br />opportunity to be part of the project and not to restrict the assessment <br />to only a portion of the downtown area. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Dick Dorsey, property owner and business owner of Dick's Main Tap, <br />indicated his opposition to the beautification project. He stated he <br />was against a majority of the improvements but was in favor of adding <br />trash receptacles to the downtown area. He stated he was also opposed <br />to the method of assessment and felt the assessment should be determined <br />by front footage. He stated this should be dealt with in the same <br />method as sewer and street assessments. <br /> <br />Steve Johnson, property owner and business owner of Johnson's <br />Department Store, indicated his support for the project. He indicated <br />that the City of Monticello is proposing the same type of project and <br />the price is much higher than the City of Elk River is charging. Mr. <br />Johnson stated that the. criteria for drawing new business to the <br />community is the location, and the beautification of downtown will draw <br />business to the downtown area. He also indicated that the assessment <br />method is the best compromise for determining the assessment amount due <br />per parcel of property. <br /> <br />Mike Rafferty, property owner and business owner of Elk <br />Chiropractic Office, indicated he was not totally opposed <br />assessment, but that he was opposed to the method of assessment. <br /> <br />River <br />to the <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Al Nadeau stated that the people signed the document opposing the <br />assessment with the knowledge that the assessment per one full unit <br />would be $3,750. He indicated that with the new figure of $2,950, there <br />may be some people willing to withdraw their signature. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.