Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City Council Minutes <br />July 31, 1989 <br /> <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER DOBEL MOVED TO CALL A SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON <br />AUGUST 21, 1989, AT 6:45 P.M. TO INTERVIEW AN APPLICANT FOR THE LIBRARY <br />BOARD. COUNCILMEMBER HOLMGREN SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED <br />5-0. <br /> <br />9. <br /> <br />Bud~et Discussion/Certification of Proposed Maximum Levy <br /> <br />Lori Johnson, Finance Director, stated that the City must certify the <br />maximum tax levy to the County Auditor by August 1 in order to comply <br />with the 1988 Truth in Taxation Law. She further indicated that the <br />proposed City of Elk River levy for 1990 is $1,760,907, and that this <br />maximum levy most likely will be lowered. <br /> <br />Ms. Johnson also indicated that the 1980 Improvement Bond levy has been <br />increased by $19,454 to a total levy of $25,000 due to delinquent <br />special assessments in Hobbit Hills. <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER DOBEL MOVED TO INCREASE THE IMPROVEMENT BOND LEVY TO <br />$25,000. COUNCILMEMBER KROPUENSKE SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION <br />CARRIED 5-0. <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER HOLMGREN MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 89-51, A RESOLUTION <br />AUTHORIZING THE PROPOSED MAXIMUM 1990 TAX LEVY OF $1,760,907. <br />COUNCILMEMBER DOBEL SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />The City Administrator indicated that he is prepared to present a <br />preliminary budget to the City Council for review. He indicated that <br />the budget on the low end will increase 9.4% while on the high end, <br />will increase 13.3%. <br /> <br />The City Administrator distributed a hand out to the council entitled <br />"Source of Funds". He indicated that this reflects the revenues <br />anticipated to be received in 1990. Two revenue projections were <br />reviewedj one based on the 1988 law and one. based on the vetoed 1989 <br />law. Including revenue increases generated at the City level, the <br />total budget increases could be $202,500 (1989 vetoed) or $285,500 <br />(1988 law). <br /> <br />The City Administrator distributed an appropriations summary sheet to <br />the Council which reflects proposed departmental budgets. The City <br />Administrator reviewed each department proposed budget and discussed <br />the reasons for the requested increases within each department. Total <br />requested expenditure increases were $349,200 or 16.27%. Based on <br />available revenues, the requests will have to be cut but it is <br />uncertain how much needs to be cut. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />The City Administrator distributed another hand out entitled "Equipment <br />Certificates - Capital Outlay". He informed the Council that the 1990 <br />proposal for equipment certificates is for $99,500 which includes 3 <br />police carSj 1 building and zoning vehiclej 2nd part payment for a <br />street department truck and the last payment on the grader. <br />