My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.3 ERMUSR 03-13-2018
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2014-2024
>
2018
>
03-13-2018
>
5.3 ERMUSR 03-13-2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2018 1:13:34 PM
Creation date
3/9/2018 1:13:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
3/13/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Elk River Municipal Utilities <br /> Funded by a grant from the Demonstration of Energy & Efficiency Developments (DEED) Program, the <br /> eReliability Tracker Annual Report was created by the American Public Power Association (the <br /> Association) to assist utilities in their efforts to understand and analyze their electric system. This report <br /> focuses on distribution system reliability across the country and is customized to each utility. The data <br /> used to generate this report reflect activity in the eReliability Tracker from January 1, 2017 to December <br /> 31, 2017. Note that if you currently do not have a full year of data in the system, this analysis may not <br /> properly reflect your utility's statistics since it only includes data recorded as of February 3, 2018; <br /> therefore, any changes made after that date are not represented herein. <br /> I. General Overview <br /> Reliability reflects both historic and ongoing engineering investment decisions within a utility. Proper use <br /> of reliability metrics ensures that a utility is not only performing its intended function, but also is providing <br /> service in a consistent and effective manner. Even though the primary use of reliability statistics is for self- <br /> evaluation, utilities can use these statistics to compare with data from similar utilities. However, <br /> differences such as electrical network configuration, ambient environment, weather conditions, and <br /> number of customers served typically limit most utility-to-utility comparisons. Due to the diverse range of <br /> utilities that use the eReliability Tracker, this report endeavors to group utilities by size and region to <br /> improve comparative analyses while reducing differences. <br /> Since this report contains overall data for all utilities that use the eReliability Tracker, it is important to <br /> consider the effect that a particularly large or small utility can have on the rest of the data. To ease the <br /> issues associated with comparability, reliability statistics are calculated for each utility with their respective <br /> customer weight taken into account prior to being aggregated with other utilities. This means that all <br /> utilities are equally weighted and all individual statistics are developed on a per customer basis. <br /> The aggregate statistics displayed in this report are calculated from utilities that experienced more than <br /> two outages in 2017. Also, utilities that experienced no outages this year, or did not upload any data, will <br /> have None/Null values in their report for their utility-specific data and were not included in the aggregate <br /> analysis. <br /> The aggregate statistics provided in the following sections of the report are based on data from 253 <br /> utilities. <br /> 2 <br /> 205 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.