Laserfiche WebLink
t tou,,,ing aml Redevelopmoit "Minutes P�age 4 <br />fllbrwary 1), 2018 <br />Bank who is providing the fir�.ancing for this project. She indicated she will abstain frorn <br />voting on this item. <br />("hart 'Yoth asked if there was a quorurn. <br />Ms. OthOLidt stated that after C011SUItill.gwidt the. 144A attorneys, SIle was advised that this is <br />a tinique sitiiatton with the two comi-russioners abstaining. It leaves the remaining three <br />commissioners to vote, and even though one commissioner is absent, a quortun still exists <br />because two out of the three corritnissioners are able to vote. 'I "he result of the vote will be <br />shared with the Cottncil later that evening. <br />Ms. Othoudt presented the staff report arid OLItIffled die HRA policy and applicant's request. <br />She'itlicatLd on <br />11 .1 anuary 3 1, the Finance CommiI <br />ttee made a motion to recommend the <br />HRA approve establishing a 26 year non-contiguous housing district, <br />Nis. OthOUdt indicated staffs concerns Nvas that. the Jacks(.)n Hills project whether pocAed <br />with the ER .Lodge garage construction or alone does riot "'exceed" the objectives identified <br />in the policy as required to tnerit the'FIF'extens.ion to 26 years. Staff felt that thcJackson <br />Hills project should not extend beyond aTIF term of 15-yeats per the city"s policy. In <br />addldt:)n, she explained that pooling increment from Jackson Hills to the Elk River Lodge <br />project should not be needed as this project was already approved as an apartment complex <br />by the City C.ouncil on its own merit iri order to cornea into compliance with the city zoning <br />code. <br />MS. (AhOLidt indicated that the policy as approved in December does not address p6.)rity <br />projects for pooling increment and she recommends reviewing each project separately, each <br />on their own rnerits, to detern-drie whether they qualify for tax incrernent financffilg. <br />Nlikael,a H uot ftorn Springsted Incorporated was present to answer questiOns as well as the <br />developer. <br />'I'lie commission asked questions regarding the TIF terms, coupling two projected together <br />previc)usly, and if other cities had ever done sornethirig similar. <br />Ms. Fluor stated there are cities that use that flexibility and noted different districts have <br />different rules. She said 1.11k River's policy does not address non-contiguous TlF districts <br />because that was how, the policy was written and because of that, both projects would have <br />to qualify on their own rnerit. <br />(,onarrussioner C,huba suKgested that the, Corni-nission consider the rec(.:aiu-.nendafiori <br />provided by thenot <br />Joint Finance Committee. Commissioner Toth indicated that he would <br />support pooling the: increment frorn the Jackson Hills project to the Elk River Lodge <br />project, but would support the Jackson Hills project as a. standak.)ne project and TIF District. <br />The commissioners would like to discuss the T] F policy with regards to allow.log pooling of <br />increment at a later tneeting. <br />